Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive	34.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (50%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 6000+ 5,594 User benchmarks, average bench 41% Socket M2, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	38.9% Below average	Memory 65.5 1-Core 31.2 2-Core 54.9 35% 50.5 Pts	4-Core 74.7 8-Core 72.4 10% 73.6 Pts	64-Core 89.3 6% 89.3 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 38.9% Great: 48%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OCZ Trion 150 240GB-$196 15,660 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 114GB free (System drive) Firmware: SAFZ12.3 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 1306 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 472 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 0 (A9) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 198 198 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 52 (C2) HDA temperature 66 53 201864445986 (F1) Unknown 100 100 137726	34.5% Below average	Read 221 Write 152 Mixed 153 39% 175 MB/s	4K Read 20 4K Write 24.8 4K Mixed 7.65 53% 17.5 MB/s	DQ Read 19.6 DQ Write 27.8 DQ Mixed 7.53 10% 18.3 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 34.5% Great: 95%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 3x2GB 45,030 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 3 of 4 slots used 6GB DIMM Performing below potential (11^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	14.2% Very poor	MC Read 4.1 MC Write 4.2 MC Mixed 4.2 12% 4.17 GB/s	SC Read 4.1 SC Write 4.5 SC Mixed 5 13% 4.53 GB/s	Latency 112 36% 112 ns
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 14.2% Great: 52%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 51%

Yacht

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

GPU
GTX 650-TiNvidia $152Bench 14%, 36,698 samples	2x
Radeon HD 6670AMDBench 6%, 32,193 samples	2x
GeForce 9600 GTNvidiaBench 4%, 20,826 samples	1x

SSD
870 EVO 500GBSamsung $60Bench 104%, 60,851 samples	2x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $37Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	1x
840 Evo 120GBSamsung $85Bench 91%, 104,444 samples	1x

Value: 35% - Below average

Total price: $282

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16