Asus SABERTOOTH 990FX

Performance Results


Gaming 44% Speed boat	Desktop 76% Battleship	Workstation 37% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (88th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 12 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	58.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	103% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

6 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus SABERTOOTH 990FX (all builds)
Memory	12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20121016
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 12 '18 at 08:50
Run Duration	158 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	0%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8350-$130 313,196 User benchmarks, average bench 61% Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4.35 GHz Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	70.4% Very good	Memory 91.3 1-Core 74.7 2-Core 147 64% 104 Pts	4-Core 269 8-Core 448 44% 358 Pts	64-Core 449 28% 449 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 70.4% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119 627,793 User benchmarks, average bench 52% MSI(1462 8C95) CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing below potential (100^th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (72 fps cap detected)	58.9% Above average	Lighting 72.6 Reflection 72.2 Parallax 63.2 59% 69.3 fps	MRender 72.4 Gravity 69.2 Splatting 72 58% 71.2 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 58.9% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$115 141,929 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 108GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXM0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (49^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 2529 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 638 (B1) Unknown 99 99 18 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 71 61 29 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 99 99 46 (EB) Unknown 99 99 73 (F1) Unknown 99 99 9966267598	103% Outstanding	Read 521 Write 450 Mixed 489 109% 486 MB/s	4K Read 30.6 4K Write 76.7 4K Mixed 42.2 141% 49.9 MB/s	DQ Read 278 DQ Write 202 DQ Mixed 118 121% 199 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 124%
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$115 141,929 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 108GB free Firmware: EXM0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 2640 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 608 (B1) Unknown 99 99 3 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 73 59 27 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 70 (F1) Unknown 99 99 1839533086
Poor: 71% Great: 124%
WD VelociRaptor 500GB-$62 8,133 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 175GB free Firmware: 04.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 50 (03) Spinup time 197 192 3133 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 767 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 9 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 3226 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 742 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 78 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 688 (C2) HDA temperature 128 113 22 (C4) Reallocation count 191 191 9 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	112% Outstanding	Read 229 Write 159 Mixed 169 139% 186 MB/s	4K Read 1.12 4K Write 4.1 4K Mixed 0.37 164% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 112% Great: 113%
ASMT 2105 500GB 869 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 100GB free, PID 5136 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	56.6% Above average	Read 168 Write 120 Mixed 83 146% 124 MB/s	4K Read 0.84 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.21 75% 0.98 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 56.6% Great: 159%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 16GB 70,565 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	51.8% Above average	MC Read 21.4 MC Write 16.2 MC Mixed 18.6 54% 18.7 GB/s	SC Read 10.6 SC Write 8.7 SC Mixed 12 30% 10.4 GB/s	Latency 65.2 61% 65.2 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 51.8% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical SABERTOOTH 990FX Builds (Compare 422 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 36%

Jet ski

Desktop 68%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 29%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus SABERTOOTH 990FX - $200

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	119x
FX-8150AMD $770Bench 59%, 22,181 samples	75x
FX-8120AMDBench 56%, 25,690 samples	66x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	32x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	24x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	18x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	16x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	10x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	9x

RAM
16GBUnknownBench 41%, 70,565 samples	226x
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	90x
32GBUnknownBench 53%, 5,781 samples	37x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 77% - Very good

Total price: $527

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16