Asrock Z77 Extreme4

Performance Results


Gaming 51% Yacht	Desktop 90% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 40% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	54.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	44.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asrock Z77 Extreme4 (all builds)
Memory	6.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920x1080x4294967296 szín,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20151217
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 11 '18 at 19:32
Run Duration	312 Seconds
Run User	HUN-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3570K-$136 185,516 User benchmarks, average bench 68% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	88.7% Excellent	Memory 94.3 1-Core 123 2-Core 246 87% 154 Pts	4-Core 482 8-Core 473 64% 477 Pts	64-Core 482 30% 482 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 88.7% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 290X-$549 37,353 User benchmarks, average bench 51% Sapphire(174B E285) CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 18.3.4 Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	54.4% Above average	Lighting 67.3 Reflection 58.2 Parallax 83 55% 69.5 fps	MRender 59.2 Gravity 58.1 Splatting 74.9 54% 64.1 fps
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 54.4% Great: 55%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$29 166,392 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 10GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFK71E0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 1260 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 376 (94) Unknown 255 255 0 (95) Unknown 255 255 0 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 0 (A9) Unknown 100 100 5 (AA) Unknown 100 100 6 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 1048639 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 255 255 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 125 (C2) HDA temperature 68 46 231929413664 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (DA) Unknown 100 100 0 (E7) Temperature 100 100 98 (E9) Unknown 100 100 1640 (F1) Unknown 100 100 1857 (F2) Unknown 100 100 1701 (F4) Unknown 100 100 16 (F5) Unknown 100 100 63 (F6) Unknown 100 100 97404	44.9% Average	Read 313 Write 263 Mixed 287 64% 287 MB/s	4K Read 16.4 4K Write 42.6 4K Mixed 2.15 50% 20.4 MB/s	DQ Read 6.07 DQ Write 117 DQ Mixed 3.91 20% 42.5 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 44.9% Great: 85%
WD Blue 320GB (2008)-$39 64,707 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 31GB free Firmware: 05.01D05 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 1539 (03) Spinup time 142 140 3875 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2367 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 92 92 6459 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1868 (C0) Power-off retract count 199 199 1391 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 975 (C2) HDA temperature 112 88 31 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 172 3 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 193 1 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 21803 (C8) Write error rate 200 194 14	59.3% Above average	Read 105 Write 102 Mixed 95.4 76% 101 MB/s	4K Read 0.53 4K Write 1.52 4K Mixed 0.3 84% 0.78 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 59.3% Great: 60%
Samsung HD161HJ 160GB-$40 22,667 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 8GB free Firmware: JF100-19 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 253 99 0 (03) Spinup time 253 253 4352 (04) Start/Stop count 89 89 11390 (05) Reallocated sector count 253 253 0 (07) Seek error rate 253 253 0 (08) Seek timer performance 253 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 23167 (0A) Spinup retry count 253 253 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 253 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 4597 (0D) Soft read error rate 100 100 21308 (B8) Unknown 253 253 0 (BB) vendor-specific 1 1 4850648 (BC) Unknown 253 253 0 (BE) vendor-specific 157 100 772014107 (C2) HDA temperature 151 97 788791325 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 21308 (C4) Reallocation count 253 253 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 253 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 253 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 253 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 253 253 0	25% Poor	Read 37.1 Write 49.9 Mixed 66.3 39% 51.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.39 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.28 62% 0.49 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 25% Great: 42%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 32GB-$9 66,405 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 5GB free, PID 1666 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	19.3% Very poor	Read 73.1 Write 21.3 Mixed 32.8 45% 42.4 MB/s	4K Read 7.74 4K Write 0.71 4K Mixed 0.67 75% 3.04 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 19.3% Great: 28%
Philips USB Flash Drive 16GB 344 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 5GB free, PID 4100 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	9.06% Terrible	Read 23.8 Write 10.1 Mixed 9.5 16% 14.5 MB/s	4K Read 4.97 4K Write 0.72 4K Mixed 0.49 60% 2.06 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 9.06% Great: 9%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLE4G3D21BCE1J.8FN 2x4GB 66 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	59.4% Above average	MC Read 21.6 MC Write 21.3 MC Mixed 17.9 58% 20.3 GB/s	SC Read 16 SC Write 19.9 SC Mixed 18.8 52% 18.2 GB/s	Latency 59.1 68% 59.1 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 59.4% Great: 73%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z77 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 4,005 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 37%

Jet ski

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 29%

Raft

Motherboard: Asrock Z77 Extreme4 - $165

CPU
Core i5-3570KIntel $136Bench 68%, 185,516 samples	1,522x
Core i7-3770KIntel $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples	949x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	556x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	310x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	268x
HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples	237x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	173x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	140x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	107x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	90x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBCorsairBench 54%, 43,127 samples	86x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples	81x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 60% - Good

Total price: $581

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16