Asus CM1855

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 44% Speed boat	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	5.97% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	71.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (82%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus CM1855 (all builds)
Memory	7.3 GB free of 10 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120924
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	May 11 '18 at 18:41
Run Duration	178 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	82%

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8120 25,690 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	44.5% Average	Memory 68.3 1-Core 29.5 2-Core 69.8 37% 55.9 Pts	4-Core 118 8-Core 147 17% 133 Pts	64-Core 146 9% 146 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 44.5% Great: 63%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7670 3,465 User benchmarks, average bench 6% Asus(1043 0467) 2GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004 Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	5.97% Terrible	Lighting 7.8 Reflection 7.46 Parallax 7.47 6% 7.58 fps	MRender 6.29 Gravity 6.23 Splatting 6.57 5% 6.36 fps
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 5.97% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 866GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 702 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 12 (B1) Unknown 100 100 0 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 59 52 41 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 99 99 25 (EB) Unknown 99 99 7 (F1) Unknown 99 99 630712592	71.3% Very good	Read 501 Write 379 Mixed 409 96% 430 MB/s	4K Read 23.4 4K Write 32.2 4K Mixed 23 82% 26.2 MB/s	DQ Read 73 DQ Write 51.3 DQ Mixed 28.5 30% 51 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 71.3% Great: 133%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$48 144,544 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 1.5TB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 187 171 5608 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 181 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 56 56 32812 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 160 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 127 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 54 (C2) HDA temperature 111 102 39 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	87.6% Excellent	Read 158 Write 147 Mixed 152 115% 152 MB/s	4K Read 0.73 4K Write 2.77 4K Mixed 0.31 117% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 87.6% Great: 112%
Seagate FreeAgent Go 160GB 145 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 130GB free, PID 2000 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	11.6% Very poor	Read 24.8 Write 25.7 Mixed 8.68 24% 19.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.41 4K Write 0.75 4K Mixed 0.24 35% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 11.6% Great: 15%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown SLA302G08-GGNHC SLA302G08-GGNHC SLZ302G08-GGNHC 10GB 108 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096, 2048 MB Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	30.6% Below average	MC Read 11.4 MC Write 10.2 MC Mixed 11.2 31% 10.9 GB/s	SC Read 5.9 SC Write 6.5 SC Mixed 7 18% 6.47 GB/s	Latency 105 38% 105 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 30.6% Great: 47%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical CM1855 Builds (Compare 38 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 14%

Tree trunk

Desktop 65%

Destroyer

Workstation 12%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus CM1855

CPU
FX-8300AMD $168Bench 58%, 49,767 samples	17x
FX-8120AMDBench 56%, 25,690 samples	10x
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	5x

GPU
HD 7770AMDBench 12%, 38,053 samples	6x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	3x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	3x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	2x
M4 128GBCrucial $116Bench 60%, 34,516 samples	1x
840 Evo 120GBSamsung $85Bench 91%, 104,444 samples	1x

RAM
MI64C1D1629Z1 2x8GBAdataBench 54%, 2,816 samples	4x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBCorsairBench 54%, 43,127 samples	3x
AO2L16BC8R2-BR2S Corsair CML16GX3M2A1600C10 16GBAdataBench 25%, 4 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 76% - Very good

Total price: $211

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16