HP Z800 Workstation

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 63% Destroyer	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 8GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	HP Z800 Workstation (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 0AECh
Memory	1.6 GB free of 8.00195 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20130715
Uptime	4.9 Days
Run Date	May 10 '18 at 16:57
Run Duration	286 Seconds
Run User	MEX-User
Background CPU	18%

PC Performing as expected (41^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon X5560 520 User benchmarks, average bench 68% CPU0 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	71.3% Very good	Memory 90.1 1-Core 76.8 2-Core 151 65% 106 Pts	4-Core 307 8-Core 301 41% 304 Pts	64-Core 301 19% 301 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 71.3% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro FX 3800 3,739 User benchmarks, average bench 6% Nvidia(10DE 0661) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.0 Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	7% Terrible	Lighting 9.5 Reflection 8.38 Parallax 4.31 8% 7.4 fps	MRender 8.33 Gravity 7.23 Splatting 5.43 6% 7 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 7% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$34 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 219GB free Firmware: CC62 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 116 88 100720680 (03) Spinup time 97 91 0 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2504 (05) Reallocated sector count 95 95 7552 (07) Seek error rate 85 60 4651905379 (09) Power-on hours count 70 70 26493 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1583 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 1 1 230 (BC) Unknown 100 99 1 (BD) vendor-specific 81 81 19 (BE) vendor-specific 69 53 555221023 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 958 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 99 99 2581 (C2) HDA temperature 31 47 60129542175 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 16 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 16 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -5862630333109 (F1) Unknown 100 253 -36598870167400 (F2) Unknown 100 253 78492689411276	82.1% Excellent	Read 150 Write 136 Mixed 70.8 88% 119 MB/s	4K Read 0.68 4K Write 1.14 4K Mixed 0.31 84% 0.71 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 82.1% Great: 112%
WD WD1001FAES-60Z2A0 1TB 11,642 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 72GB free Firmware: 06.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 174 169 4283 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1400 (05) Reallocated sector count 199 199 6 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 67 67 24392 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1033 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 97 6 (BE) vendor-specific 69 32 69239756619807 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 359 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 1040 (C4) Reallocation count 194 194 6 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 25 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	42.5% Average	Read 75.2 Write 72.7 Mixed 7.59 37% 51.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.76 4K Mixed 0.31 92% 0.89 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 42.5% Great: 75%
WD WD25 00JS-58NCB1 250GB 17,984 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 55GB free (System drive) Firmware: 02.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 192 179 5383 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 949 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 81 81 14158 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 504 (BE) vendor-specific 69 28 31 (C2) HDA temperature 119 78 31 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	22.7% Poor	Read 34.4 Write 44.3 Mixed 20.9 24% 33.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.36 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.2 69% 0.75 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 22.7% Great: 35%
OCZ-VERT EX2 240GB 176GB free, PID 1567 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	26.1% Poor	Read 29 Write 25.4 Mixed 27.1 35% 27.2 MB/s	4K Read 5.02 4K Write 4.95 4K Mixed 3.4 303% 4.46 MB/s

SanDisk Ultra Flair USB 3.0 32GB-$8 9,864 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 29GB free, PID 5591 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	13.8% Very poor	Read 26.9 Write 15.1 Mixed 18.6 24% 20.2 MB/s	4K Read 4.02 4K Write 1.85 4K Mixed 1.29 122% 2.39 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 13.8% Great: 39%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 AD HMT325U7CFR8C-H9 ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 42GB 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 34816 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	43.7% Average	MC Read 15.7 MC Write 15.1 MC Mixed 13.9 43% 14.9 GB/s	SC Read 10.6 SC Write 12.9 SC Mixed 12.2 34% 11.9 GB/s	Latency 67.1 60% 67.1 ns

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z800 Workstation Builds (Compare 1,940 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Destroyer

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

System: HP Z800 Workstation

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon X56501stBench 64%, 7,756 samples	318x
CPU: Intel Xeon X56751stBench 68%, 4,275 samples	188x
CPU: Intel Xeon X56701stBench 67%, 4,676 samples	179x

GPU
Quadro 4000NvidiaBench 7%, 8,609 samples	161x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	87x
Quadro 5000NvidiaBench 10%, 751 samples	67x

SSD
WDS100T2B0A-00SM50 1TBWDCBench 98%, 74,123 samples	38x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	34x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	34x

RAM
ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 58GBUnknownBench 50%, 261 samples	23x
ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 JE... 82GBUnknownBench 53%, 67 samples	19x
ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD H... 130GBUnknownBench 53%, 67 samples	15x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16