HP AWRDACPI

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemHP AWRDACPI  (all builds)
MotherboardMSI 09AC
Memory1.2 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20060224
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 08 '18 at 15:30
Run Duration373 Seconds
Run User REU-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 3800+-$84
Socket 939, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
29.9% Poor
Memory 54.9
1-Core 18.8
2-Core 31.9
26% 35.2 Pts
4-Core 30.9
8-Core 31.3
4% 31.1 Pts
64-Core 27.4
2% 27.4 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 29.9%
Great: 43%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD800JD-75MSA3 80GB-$105
54GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 10.01E03 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
28.9% Poor
Read 51.5
Write 49
Mixed 25.9
31% 42.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.52
4K Write 1.48
4K Mixed 0.25
77% 0.75 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 28.9%
Great: 33%
USB DISK 2.0 8GB
2GB free, PID 4200
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
3.14% Terrible
Read 13.4
Write 3.39
Mixed 2.48
6% 6.43 MB/s
4K Read 1.87
4K Write 0.005
4K Mixed 0.005
7% 0.62 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.14%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x1GB
2 of 4 slots used
2GB DIMM DDR
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
12.5% Very poor
MC Read 4.7
MC Write 3.9
MC Mixed 3.4
11% 4 GB/s
SC Read 2.4
SC Write 3.3
SC Mixed 3.3
9% 3 GB/s
Latency 144
28% 144 ns
Poor: 6%
This bench: 12.5%
Great: 20%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical AWRDACPI Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: HP AWRDACPI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 47% - Average Total price: $130
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback