Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 14% Tree trunk	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 10.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	1.83% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	51.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Packard EasyNote TS11HR (all builds)
Motherboard	Packard SJV50_HR
Memory	4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20120809
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 11 '16 at 14:30
Run Duration	280 Seconds
Run User	SWE-User
Background CPU	100%

PC Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-2310M-$80 25,542 User benchmarks, average bench 46% CPU1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	10.1% Very poor	Memory 10.9 1-Core 15.4 2-Core 33.8 11% 20 Pts	4-Core 52 8-Core 64.4 8% 58.2 Pts	64-Core 100 6% 100 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 10.1% Great: 54%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Acer(1025 0511) 2GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4229 Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	1.83% Terrible	Lighting 2 Reflection 2.81 Parallax 1.38 2% 2.06 fps	MRender 2.86 Gravity 1.13 Splatting 3.74 2% 2.58 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.83% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 202GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 1 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 5 (B1) Unknown 100 100 0 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 54 54 46 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 100 100 0 (F1) Unknown 99 99 88517395	51.2% Above average	Read 483 Write 257 Mixed 302 77% 348 MB/s	4K Read 13 4K Write 19.1 4K Mixed 11.8 45% 14.6 MB/s	DQ Read 65.1 DQ Write 41.1 DQ Mixed 15.6 22% 40.6 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 51.2% Great: 124%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 16GB 60,539 User benchmarks, average bench 11% 2GB free, PID 5567 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	7.32% Terrible	Read 17.9 Write 4.84 Mixed 6.66 10% 9.81 MB/s	4K Read 4.36 4K Write 0.86 4K Mixed 0.99 79% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 7.32% Great: 17%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown HMT351S6BFR8C-H9 Nanya NT4GC64B8HB0NS-CG 8GB 28 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	32.2% Below average	MC Read 12.9 MC Write 12.9 MC Mixed 13.3 37% 13 GB/s	SC Read 4.9 SC Write 3.8 SC Mixed 4.4 12% 4.37 GB/s	Latency 396 10% 396 ns
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 32.2% Great: 50%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 47%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	134x
HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 110,588 samples	33x
HD Graphics (G2 Pentium/Celeron 1.1/1.15 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 45,735 samples	19x

SSD
BX500 240GBCrucial $29Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	11x
PLUS 240GBSandiskBench 45%, 86,316 samples	7x
GP-GSTFS31256GTND 256GBGigabyteBench 71%, 3,461 samples	4x

RAM
NT2GC64B88B0NS-CG 2x2GBNanyaBench 31%, 6,518 samples	17x
ACR512X64D3S13C9G 2x4GBKingstonBench 44%, 888 samples	12x
NT2GC64B8HC0NS-CG 2x2GBNanyaBench 29%, 2,059 samples	9x

Value: 50% - Average

Total price: $189

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16