User System

Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 42% Speed boat	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	7.88% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	28.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	ThirdWave Prime Series
Motherboard	MICRO-STAR MS-7519
Memory	1.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20080917
Uptime	2.8 Days
Run Date	May 07 '18 at 07:33
Run Duration	184 Seconds
Run User	JPN-User
Background CPU	36%

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Quad Q9550-$161 34,093 User benchmarks, average bench 49% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.85 GHz Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	41.5% Average	Memory 61.1 1-Core 33.9 2-Core 67.7 36% 54.2 Pts	4-Core 128 8-Core 130 17% 129 Pts	64-Core 127 8% 127 Pts
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 41.5% Great: 57%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730 164,888 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Gigabyte(1458 36B8) 1GB CLim: 1006 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	7.88% Terrible	Lighting 9.97 Reflection 8.65 Parallax 10.3 8% 9.63 fps	MRender 11.9 Gravity 8.2 Splatting 7.74 7% 9.28 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 7.88% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Crucial M4 128GB-$116 34,516 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 54GB free (System drive) Firmware: 000F Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 35343 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1247 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 17127 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 95 95 173 (AE) Unknown 100 100 187 (B5) Unknown 100 100 -119266066604272 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 14700757 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 82 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 0 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 31 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 95 95 5 (CE) Flying height 100 100 17127	28.7% Poor	Read 214 Write 169 Mixed 118 37% 167 MB/s	4K Read 16.3 4K Write 7.93 4K Mixed 4.34 34% 9.53 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 28.7% Great: 72%
Hitachi Deskstar P7K500 500GB-$159 43,620 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 73GB free Firmware: GM4OA5CA Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 133 133 138 (03) Spinup time 120 120 25789268308 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 11907 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 129 129 30 (09) Power-on hours count 92 92 61261 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 2036 (C0) Power-off retract count 88 88 14414 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 88 88 14414 (C2) HDA temperature 162 162 219043790885 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 9	31.4% Below average	Read 56 Write 53.1 Mixed 28.6 34% 45.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.56 4K Write 1.58 4K Mixed 0.33 89% 0.82 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 31.4% Great: 51%
I-O DATA HDCZ-UT 3TB 64 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 1TB free, PID 016c Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	45.2% Average	Read 106 Write 99.8 Mixed 63.1 111% 89.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.54 4K Mixed 0.29 100% 1.24 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 45.2% Great: 72%
Seagate Expansion Desk 3TB 65 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 868GB free, PID 3321 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	56.4% Above average	Read 118 Write 78.3 Mixed 8.25 72% 68.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.85 4K Write 7.14 4K Mixed 0.56 265% 2.85 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 56.4% Great: 73%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM SDRAM Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	18.7% Very poor	MC Read 6.6 MC Write 6.3 MC Mixed 6.2 18% 6.37 GB/s	SC Read 3.8 SC Write 3.6 SC Mixed 4.8 12% 4.07 GB/s	Latency 125 32% 125 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 18.7% Great: 44%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

User System

Performance Results

PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)