User System

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics14.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive40.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardSupermicro X8DT3
Memory29.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120317
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 06 '18 at 17:59
Run Duration91 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon L5630
CPU 2, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.15 GHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
59.1% Above average
Memory 79.6
1-Core 52.5
2-Core 104
50% 78.8 Pts
4-Core 210
8-Core 362
35% 286 Pts
64-Core 544
34% 544 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 59.1%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 460 v2
Gigabyte(1458 34FC) 1GB
CLim: 788 MHz, MLim: 1002 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
14.2% Very poor
Lighting 16.8
Reflection 18.4
Parallax 14.4
14% 16.5 fps
MRender 22.2
Gravity 18.1
Splatting 16.7
15% 19 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 14.2%
Great: 15%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
116GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
40.2% Average
Read 199
Write 158
Mixed 158
38% 172 MB/s
4K Read 16
4K Write 33.1
4K Mixed 18.9
66% 22.7 MB/s
DQ Read 34.7
DQ Write 60.6
DQ Mixed 20.4
23% 38.5 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 40.2%
Great: 124%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5403-034.A00G 8x4GB
8 of 12 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1066 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
31.9% Below average
MC Read 12.5
MC Write 10.8
MC Mixed 9.8
32% 11 GB/s
SC Read 8.4
SC Write 5.5
SC Mixed 7.2
20% 7.03 GB/s
Latency 81.3
49% 81.3 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 31.9%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback