Intel X79

Performance Results


Gaming 46% Yacht	Desktop 82% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 42% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	51% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	54.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Intel X79 (all builds)
Memory	29.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit färger
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170628
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 06 '18 at 07:21
Run Duration	167 Seconds
Run User	NOR-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4960X-$1,189 5,121 User benchmarks, average bench 78% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	78.5% Very good	Memory 83.4 1-Core 100 2-Core 215 75% 133 Pts	4-Core 396 8-Core 651 64% 524 Pts	64-Core 779 48% 779 Pts
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 78.5% Great: 88%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 780-Ti-$410 30,815 User benchmarks, average bench 53% Asus(1043 8495) 3GB CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing below potential (42^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	51% Above average	Lighting 63.8 Reflection 61.5 Parallax 77 52% 67.4 fps	MRender 72.3 Gravity 67.7 Splatting 46.3 49% 62.1 fps
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 51% Great: 59%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 750 Series NVMe PCIe 400GB-$550 8,641 User benchmarks, average bench 186% 276GB free (System drive) Firmware: 01H0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	54.9% Above average	Read 171 Write 170 Mixed 213 42% 185 MB/s	4K Read 24.2 4K Write 68.7 4K Mixed 23.1 103% 38.7 MB/s	DQ Read 160 DQ Write 145 DQ Mixed 15.2 49% 107 MB/s
Poor: 123% ↑ This bench: 54.9% Great: 230%
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$190 73,119 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 238GB free Firmware: DXM06B0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 99 99 21 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 18316 (0C) Power cycle count 95 95 4837 (B1) Unknown 93 93 240 (B3) Unknown 99 99 21 (B5) Unknown 99 99 21 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 99 99 21 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 69 53 31 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 3192 (F1) Unknown 99 99 62882202531	76.3% Very good	Read 513 Write 465 Mixed 502 110% 493 MB/s	4K Read 24.4 4K Write 44.6 4K Mixed 17 82% 28.7 MB/s	DQ Read 19.7 DQ Write 107 DQ Mixed 76.2 55% 67.8 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 76.3% Great: 116%
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$190 73,119 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 238GB free Firmware: DXM06B0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 19290 (0C) Power cycle count 94 94 5468 (B1) Unknown 93 93 236 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 69 54 31 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 99 99 1 (EB) Unknown 99 99 1846 (F1) Unknown 99 99 69533141426	76.3% Very good	Read 513 Write 450 Mixed 495 108% 486 MB/s	4K Read 25.1 4K Write 45.5 4K Mixed 13.6 80% 28.1 MB/s	DQ Read 162 DQ Write 66.1 DQ Mixed 13.2 36% 80.5 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 76.3% Great: 116%
Hitachi HDS722020ALA330 2TB-$71 17,356 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 1.5TB free Firmware: JKAOA28A Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 98 98 262145 (02) Throughput performance 131 131 109 (03) Spinup time 120 120 51579060828 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 8699 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 112 112 39 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 31026 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 5611 (C0) Power-off retract count 93 93 9432 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 93 93 9432 (C2) HDA temperature 166 166 279173988388 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	66.8% Good	Read 119 Write 114 Mixed 115 87% 116 MB/s	4K Read 0.71 4K Write 1.22 4K Mixed 0.44 101% 0.79 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 66.8% Great: 69%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 2400 C11 4x8GB 249 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 4 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	85.1% Excellent	MC Read 34.6 MC Write 32.4 MC Mixed 32.1 94% 33 GB/s	SC Read 15.7 SC Write 14.1 SC Mixed 12.1 40% 14 GB/s	Latency 74.5 54% 74.5 ns
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 85.1% Great: 117%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X79 Builds (Compare 1,977 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 35%

Jet ski

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 32%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Intel X79

CPU
Xeon E5-2689 0IntelBench 71%, 6,987 samples	339x
Xeon E5-2650 v2IntelBench 67%, 5,123 samples	268x
Xeon E5-2640 0IntelBench 65%, 3,274 samples	143x

GPU
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	126x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	114x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	108x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	63x
A400 120GBKingston $30Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	45x
256GB 256GBSSDBench 77%, 9,229 samples	35x

RAM
M393B5170GB0- 2x4GBSamsungBench 52%, 1,540 samples	127x
M393B1K70DH0- 2x8GBSamsungBench 54%, 1,683 samples	62x
HMT151R7BFR4C 4x4GBHynixBench 67%, 393 samples	58x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 71% - Very good

Total price: $158

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16