HP p6-2315en

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics31.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive50% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
SystemHP p6-2315en  (all builds)
MotherboardMSI 2AE0
Memory10.2 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.9 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20140616
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateMay 05 '18 at 14:42
Run Duration191 Seconds
Run User KAZ-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-5500 APU-$135
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
53.2% Above average
Memory 75.3
1-Core 61.5
2-Core 110
52% 82.3 Pts
4-Core 182
8-Core 181
24% 182 Pts
64-Core 182
11% 182 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 53.2%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
Gigabyte(1458 372B) 2GB
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
31.2% Below average
Lighting 39.7
Reflection 26.4
Parallax 36.8
32% 34.3 fps
MRender 37.4
Gravity 35.4
Splatting 33.7
29% 35.5 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 31.2%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB-$89
175GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3J96R9 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
50% Average
Read 457
Write 157
Mixed 130
54% 248 MB/s
4K Read 20.5
4K Write 28.5
4K Mixed 9.71
59% 19.6 MB/s
DQ Read 158
DQ Write 69.8
DQ Mixed 27.1
43% 84.9 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 50%
Great: 88%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
779GB free
Firmware: HP64 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
58.5% Above average
Read 101
Write 103
Mixed 102
77% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.81
4K Write 1.59
4K Mixed 0.34
101% 0.91 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 58.5%
Great: 68%
Toshiba MK1656GSY 160GB
149GB free
Firmware: LH013C Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
36% Below average
Read 70
Write 55.2
Mixed 71.9
50% 65.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.44
4K Mixed 0.4
96% 0.81 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 36%
Great: 41%
Samsung HD253GJ 250GB
138GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10001 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
75.7% Very good
Read 128
Write 135
Mixed 125
98% 129 MB/s
4K Read 0.69
4K Write 2.93
4K Mixed 0.52
141% 1.38 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 75.7%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1866C10D3/4G KHX1866C10D3/4G KHX1866C10D3/4G 12GB
1866, 1866, 1866 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
30.8% Below average
MC Read 14.4
MC Write 5.9
MC Mixed 10.9
30% 10.4 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 6.1
SC Mixed 10.7
24% 8.43 GB/s
Latency 89.7
45% 89.7 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 30.8%
Great: 39%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback