Asrock X370 Gaming K4

Performance Results


Gaming 85% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 84% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 85% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	105% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	115% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asrock X370 Gaming K4 (all builds)
Memory	9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180212
Uptime	0.6 Days
Run Date	May 05 '18 at 14:03
Run Duration	218 Seconds
Run User	JPN-User
Background CPU	7%

PC Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$210 159,077 User benchmarks, average bench 76% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	78.5% Very good	Memory 69.5 1-Core 122 2-Core 242 78% 145 Pts	4-Core 469 8-Core 818 78% 644 Pts	64-Core 1,226 76% 1,226 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 78.5% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Gigabyte(1458 374C) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 397.31 Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	105% Outstanding	Lighting 134 Reflection 174 Parallax 173 109% 160 fps	MRender 115 Gravity 150 Splatting 111 102% 125 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Plextor M8Se NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB 198 User benchmarks, average bench 145% 358GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.00 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	115% Outstanding	Read 1,189 Write 387 Mixed 520 152% 699 MB/s	4K Read 35.9 4K Write 42.3 4K Mixed 30.3 116% 36.2 MB/s	DQ Read 264 DQ Write 99.5 DQ Mixed 67.2 80% 144 MB/s
Poor: 87% ↑ This bench: 115% Great: 190%
Intel 750 Series NVMe PCIe 400GB-$550 8,641 User benchmarks, average bench 186% 271GB free Firmware: 8EV101H0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	197% Outstanding	Read 1,969 Write 863 Mixed 1,244 299% 1,359 MB/s	4K Read 36.8 4K Write 119 4K Mixed 45.1 176% 66.9 MB/s	DQ Read 294 DQ Write 219 DQ Mixed 122 128% 212 MB/s
Poor: 123% ↑ This bench: 197% Great: 230%
Intel 335 Series 240GB-$219 4,220 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 111GB free Firmware: 335u Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 -90623809927085 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1969 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 1018 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 75809 (E8) Unknown 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 100 100 0 (F1) Unknown 100 100 75809 (F2) Unknown 100 100 120886 (F9) Unknown 100 100 1698	75.6% Very good	Read 502 Write 225 Mixed 310 76% 346 MB/s	4K Read 30.1 4K Write 72.1 4K Mixed 18.2 107% 40.1 MB/s	DQ Read 281 DQ Write 195 DQ Mixed 76.6 101% 184 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 75.6% Great: 92%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85 124,615 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 2.5TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 169 166 6550 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1098 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 2018 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 215 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 8 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 194 194 20391 (C2) HDA temperature 122 109 28 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	77.8% Very good	Read 135 Write 137 Mixed 125 99% 132 MB/s	4K Read 0.94 4K Write 0.43 4K Mixed 0.26 76% 0.54 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 77.8% Great: 101%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$65 103,919 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 798GB free Firmware: 01.00A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 116 108 7158 (04) Start/Stop count 84 84 16103 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 52 52 35276 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2777 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 113 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 195 195 15920 (C2) HDA temperature 120 101 27 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 190 1939 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	39.8% Below average	Read 69.3 Write 69.2 Mixed 61.3 50% 66.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.34 4K Write 1.62 4K Mixed 0.24 71% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 39.8% Great: 57%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70 212,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 972GB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 168 162 6558 (04) Start/Stop count 91 91 9151 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 74 74 19504 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2059 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 107 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 31 31 507811 (C2) HDA temperature 121 106 29 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	64.2% Good	Read 111 Write 112 Mixed 99.7 81% 108 MB/s	4K Read 0.75 4K Write 1.76 4K Mixed 0.17 83% 0.89 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 64.2% Great: 67%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3400 C16 2x8GB 397 User benchmarks, average bench 98% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2134 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz Performing below potential (11^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	70.7% Very good	MC Read 26.9 MC Write 23.9 MC Mixed 26.4 74% 25.7 GB/s	SC Read 19.1 SC Write 22.5 SC Mixed 20.3 59% 20.6 GB/s	Latency 103 39% 103 ns
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 70.7% Great: 122%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X370 Gaming K4 Builds (Compare 196 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 75%

Battleship

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 73%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock X370 Gaming K4

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	43x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	24x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	23x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	19x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	16x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	16x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	8x
XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBAdata $80Bench 279%, 85,928 samples	8x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	6x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	11x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	7x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 65% - Good

Total price: $744

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asrock X370 Gaming K4

Performance Results

PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asrock X370 Gaming K4

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)