Gigabyte GA-X58A-UD5

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive	35.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-X58A-UD5 (all builds)
Memory	3.4 GB free of 6 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20100420
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	May 04 '18 at 05:44
Run Duration	130 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-950-$100 36,389 User benchmarks, average bench 66% Socket 1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.85 GHz Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	65.8% Good	Memory 90.3 1-Core 65.1 2-Core 122 59% 92.6 Pts	4-Core 225 8-Core 348 36% 287 Pts	64-Core 350 22% 350 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 65.8% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170 123,956 User benchmarks, average bench 20% Gigabyte(1458 354E) 2GB CLim: 1324 MHz, MLim: 1577 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.1 Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 18% Great: 21%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OCZ Agility 3 120GB-$102 38,562 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 36GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.22 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 109 109 23823331 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 0 0 -50388556311317 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2969 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 857 (B1) Unknown 0 0 4 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 30 30 128850984990 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 23823331 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 23823331 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 23823331 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 9732 (EA) Unknown 0 0 13435 (F1) Unknown 0 0 13435 (F2) Unknown 0 0 19641	35.6% Below average	Read 179 Write 94.9 Mixed 130 30% 135 MB/s	4K Read 14.8 4K Write 40.9 4K Mixed 9.73 57% 21.8 MB/s	DQ Read 164 DQ Write 109 DQ Mixed 32.6 52% 102 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 35.6% Great: 61%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB 4,752 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 560GB free, PID b207 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	39.1% Below average	Read 98 Write 93 Mixed 21.7 83% 70.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.31 4K Write 1.49 4K Mixed 0.18 58% 0.66 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 39.1% Great: 50%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 3x2GB 45,030 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 3 of 6 slots used 6GB DIMM Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	44.4% Average	MC Read 17.5 MC Write 12.2 MC Mixed 16.9 44% 15.5 GB/s	SC Read 11.2 SC Write 9.3 SC Mixed 10.7 30% 10.4 GB/s	Latency 66.8 60% 66.8 ns
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 44.4% Great: 52%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X58A-UD5 Builds (Compare 343 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 23%

Surfboard

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X58A-UD5

CPU
Core i7-950Intel $100Bench 66%, 36,389 samples	80x
Core i7 930Intel $199Bench 64%, 19,497 samples	58x
Core i7 960Intel $220Bench 68%, 16,233 samples	45x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	18x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	18x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	16x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	13x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	12x
MX500 1TBCrucial $66Bench 106%, 202,785 samples	9x

RAM
6x4GBUnknownBench 47%, 28,320 samples	75x
6x2GBUnknownBench 46%, 38,297 samples	44x
3x4GBUnknownBench 42%, 39,448 samples	43x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 66% - Good

Total price: $259

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16