Asrock AB350M-HDV

Performance Results


Gaming 35% Sail boat	Desktop 80% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 33% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	36.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	126% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asrock AB350M-HDV (all builds)
Memory	4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170717
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	May 04 '18 at 05:09
Run Duration	201 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	3%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 1600-$110 392,253 User benchmarks, average bench 70% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	73% Very good	Memory 75.2 1-Core 104 2-Core 207 72% 129 Pts	4-Core 380 8-Core 678 64% 529 Pts	64-Core 854 53% 854 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 73% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Gigabyte(1458 3733) CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	36.9% Below average	Lighting 48.3 Reflection 32.1 Parallax 39.2 39% 39.9 fps	MRender 38.6 Gravity 42.5 Splatting 37.6 32% 39.6 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 36.9% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 600p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$49 58,154 User benchmarks, average bench 116% 163GB free (System drive) Firmware: PSF121C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	126% Outstanding	Read 1,355 Write 557 Mixed 784 197% 899 MB/s	4K Read 29.5 4K Write 88.4 4K Mixed 21.3 119% 46.4 MB/s	DQ Read 30.1 DQ Write 96.9 DQ Mixed 20.6 28% 49.2 MB/s
Poor: 79% ↑ This bench: 126% Great: 157%
Toshiba MQ01ABF050 500GB-$32 118,349 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 364GB free Firmware: AM003M Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 1335 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 3612 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 93 93 3077 (0A) Spinup retry count 172 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 2319 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 215 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 109 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 98 98 26070 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 231928889369 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (DC) Disk shift 100 100 0 (DE) Loaded hours 93 93 3000 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0 (E0) Load friction 100 100 0 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 261 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0	59.5% Above average	Read 103 Write 104 Mixed 97.4 76% 102 MB/s	4K Read 0.44 4K Write 1.68 4K Mixed 0.2 71% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 59.5% Great: 60%
Toshiba MK5055GSX 500GB-$33 4,927 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 123GB free Firmware: FG001A Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 1614 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 1164 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 1 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 94 94 2744 (0A) Spinup retry count 122 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 727 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 10 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 131 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 99 99 15027 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 210453987354 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 1 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 3 (DC) Disk shift 100 100 97 (DE) Loaded hours 100 100 330 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0 (E0) Load friction 100 100 0 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 374 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0	21.8% Poor	Read 36 Write 39.8 Mixed 34.7 28% 36.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.35 4K Write 0.99 4K Mixed 0.22 58% 0.52 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 21.8% Great: 42%
General USB Flash Disk 16GB 7,914 User benchmarks, average bench 8% 9GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	28% Poor	Read 136 Write 14.6 Mixed 29.2 53% 59.9 MB/s	4K Read 7.3 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 1.06 101% 3.16 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 28% Great: 15%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 2400 C15 2x4GB-$30 19,452 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	89.7% Excellent	MC Read 34.4 MC Write 33.1 MC Mixed 30.4 93% 32.6 GB/s	SC Read 22.6 SC Write 32.3 SC Mixed 26 77% 27 GB/s	Latency 89.9 44% 89.9 ns
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 89.7% Great: 88%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical AB350M-HDV Builds (Compare 388 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 26%

Raft

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 24%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock AB350M-HDV

CPU
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	81x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $125Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	43x
Ryzen 3 2200GAMD $104Bench 60%, 181,631 samples	34x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	40x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	33x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	31x

SSD
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	18x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	10x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	8x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	8x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	7x
Aegis DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $38Bench 82%, 163,634 samples	7x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $198

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16