Dell Precision WorkStation T7400

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 46%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics14.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive37.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemDell Precision WorkStation T7400  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0RW199
Memory14.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20080131
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 02 '18 at 23:18
Run Duration277 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5430
CPU, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
46% Average
Memory 66.4
1-Core 37.9
2-Core 76.8
39% 60.4 Pts
4-Core 149
8-Core 152
20% 151 Pts
64-Core 151
9% 151 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 46%
Great: 55%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 5830
XFX(1682 3070) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1901.0
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
14.3% Very poor
Lighting 19.3
Reflection 13.2
Parallax 17.8
16% 16.8 fps
MRender 11.4
Gravity 14.6
Splatting 15.2
11% 13.7 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 14.3%
Great: 14%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ Trion 150 120GB-$50
16GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFZ12.3 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
37.3% Below average
Read 260
Write 182
Mixed 186
46% 209 MB/s
4K Read 19.9
4K Write 23.7
4K Mixed 7
52% 16.9 MB/s
DQ Read 20.4
DQ Write 25.4
DQ Mixed 7.29
10% 17.7 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 37.3%
Great: 89%
Hitachi HUS153030VLS300 300GB
192GB free
Firmware: A280
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
57.4% Above average
Read 98.5
Write 101
Mixed 97.9
75% 99 MB/s
4K Read 1.38
4K Write 3.09
4K Mixed 0.94
219% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 57.4%
Great: 66%
Seagate ST3250312AS 250GB-$32
163GB free
Firmware: JC47
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
65.5% Good
Read 119
Write 109
Mixed 109
85% 113 MB/s
4K Read 0.54
4K Write 1.65
4K Mixed 0.41
98% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 65.5%
Great: 69%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 16GB-$7
7GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
7.98% Terrible
Read 33.2
Write 6.72
Mixed 10.6
17% 16.8 MB/s
4K Read 7.14
4K Write 0.006
4K Mixed 0.009
27% 2.39 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 7.98%
Great: 23%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8x2GB
8 of 8 slots used
16GB FB-DIMM DDR2 FB-DIMM
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
16% Very poor
MC Read 3.5
MC Write 6.6
MC Mixed 4.4
14% 4.83 GB/s
SC Read 3.7
SC Write 6.9
SC Mixed 4.6
14% 5.07 GB/s
Latency 110
36% 110 ns
Poor: 76%
This bench: 16%
Great: 142%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Precision WorkStation T7400 Builds (Compare 205 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

System: Dell Precision WorkStation T7400

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $238
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback