Asus P5QPL-AM

Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 50% Yacht	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	14% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	43.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P5QPL-AM (all builds)
Memory	0.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100622
Uptime	5.7 Days
Run Date	Apr 30 '18 at 12:07
Run Duration	158 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	10%

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Quad Q8200-$49 19,990 User benchmarks, average bench 43% LGA775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.35 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	46.4% Average	Memory 71.5 1-Core 32.9 2-Core 65.8 39% 56.7 Pts	4-Core 126 8-Core 128 17% 127 Pts	64-Core 129 8% 129 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 46.4% Great: 50%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 460 v2 664 User benchmarks, average bench 14% Gigabyte(1458 34FC) 1GB CLim: 788 MHz, MLim: 1002 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing as expected (60^th percentile)	14% Very poor	Lighting 16.5 Reflection 19.3 Parallax 14.8 14% 16.9 fps	MRender 22 Gravity 17 Splatting 16.8 15% 18.6 fps
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 14% Great: 15%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95 217,115 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 43GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0CB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 2600 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 2573 (B1) Unknown 98 98 21 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 59 56 41 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 56 (F1) Unknown 99 99 17413121325	43.3% Average	Read 232 Write 160 Mixed 159 41% 184 MB/s	4K Read 30.1 4K Write 29.3 4K Mixed 13.5 78% 24.3 MB/s	DQ Read 29.9 DQ Write 31.7 DQ Mixed 16.6 16% 26.1 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 43.3% Great: 118%
WD WD6400AACS-00G8B1 640GB 9,045 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 154GB free Firmware: 01.00A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 104 100 7775 (04) Start/Stop count 92 92 8790 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 86 86 10394 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 93 93 7413 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 181 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 145 145 167654 (C2) HDA temperature 113 97 34 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	40.3% Average	Read 63.9 Write 76.2 Mixed 29.2 42% 56.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.49 4K Write 1.72 4K Mixed 0.31 86% 0.84 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 40.3% Great: 49%
Samsung HD250HJ 250GB 11,393 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 56GB free Firmware: FH100-05 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (85^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 253 100 0 (03) Spinup time 253 253 4352 (04) Start/Stop count 71 71 29320 (05) Reallocated sector count 253 253 0 (07) Seek error rate 253 253 0 (08) Seek timer performance 253 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 8445 (0A) Spinup retry count 253 253 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 253 253 0 (0C) Power cycle count 91 91 9207 (0D) Soft read error rate 100 100 111715 (B8) Unknown 253 253 0 (BB) vendor-specific 253 253 0 (BC) Unknown 253 253 0 (BE) vendor-specific 133 106 739049507 (C2) HDA temperature 133 103 755826723 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 111715 (C4) Reallocation count 253 253 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 253 253 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 253 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 253 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 253 253 0	51.9% Above average	Read 86.5 Write 94.2 Mixed 63.6 61% 81.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.46 4K Write 1.48 4K Mixed 0.34 84% 0.76 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 51.9% Great: 56%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR2 Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	20.3% Poor	MC Read 6.7 MC Write 6.4 MC Mixed 6.3 18% 6.47 GB/s	SC Read 4.4 SC Write 6.4 SC Mixed 6 16% 5.6 GB/s	Latency 98 41% 98 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 20.3% Great: 44%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P5QPL-AM Builds (Compare 186 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 39%

Jet ski

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5QPL-AM

CPU
Core2 Duo E7500Intel $109Bench 39%, 39,897 samples	23x
Pentium E5300Intel $59Bench 36%, 18,604 samples	15x
Core2 Quad Q9400Intel $170Bench 46%, 24,176 samples	13x

GPU
G41 Express ChipsetIntelBench 0%, 33,874 samples	46x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	10x
GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples	9x

SSD
A400 120GBKingston $30Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	8x
CS900 120GBPNY $25Bench 69%, 42,924 samples	5x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $38Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	4x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	143x
3GBUnknownBench 14%, 81,553 samples	14x
1x2GBUnknownBench 17%, 99,586 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 42% - Average

Total price: $139

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16