HP G5340fr-m

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (65%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP G5340fr-m  (all builds)
MotherboardPEGATRON 2A99
Memory1.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100908
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 07 '16 at 21:32
Run Duration318 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 65%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X2 250 (2013 D.Ri)
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3 GHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
45.5% Average
Memory 80.6
1-Core 43.5
2-Core 73.6
45% 65.9 Pts
4-Core 62
8-Core 77.4
9% 69.7 Pts
64-Core 71.2
4% 71.2 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 45.5%
Great: 48%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HDS721075CLA 750GB
652GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JP3O
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
49.2% Average
Read 80.1
Write 91.6
Mixed 79.4
63% 83.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.24
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.26
52% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 49.2%
Great: 72%
USB DISK 2.0 16GB
11GB free, PID 4100
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
2.81% Terrible
Read 10.8
Write 2.92
Mixed 5
7% 6.24 MB/s
4K Read 2.48
4K Write 0.007
4K Mixed 0.007
10% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.81%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
26.2% Poor
MC Read 10.8
MC Write 5.6
MC Mixed 9
24% 8.47 GB/s
SC Read 6.4
SC Write 6.7
SC Mixed 7.9
20% 7 GB/s
Latency 79.4
50% 79.4 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 26.2%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $15Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback