Asrock Z370 Taichi

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 77%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 109%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 108%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics65% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive282% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
MotherboardAsrock Z370 Taichi  (all builds)
Memory13.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180322
Uptime4.3 Days
Run DateApr 29 '18 at 13:18
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$186
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Memory 98.1
1-Core 159
2-Core 319
105% 192 Pts
4-Core 627
8-Core 1,071
103% 849 Pts
64-Core 1,324
82% 1,324 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 108%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 2082 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
65% Good
Lighting 81.6
Reflection 82.6
Parallax 71.2
66% 78.4 fps
MRender 74.8
Gravity 74.2
Splatting 78
62% 75.7 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 65%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$139
232GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B6Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
282% Outstanding
Read 2,399
Write 1,901
Mixed 1,845
455% 2,048 MB/s
4K Read 52.8
4K Write 161
4K Mixed 41.9
219% 85.2 MB/s
DQ Read 54.7
DQ Write 202
DQ Mixed 175
120% 144 MB/s
Poor: 159%
This bench: 282%
Great: 353%
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$42
223GB free
Firmware: UF300000 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
38.7% Below average
Read 360
Write 184
Mixed 188
54% 244 MB/s
4K Read 19.3
4K Write 19.3
4K Mixed 3.56
44% 14 MB/s
DQ Read 19.7
DQ Write 19.7
DQ Mixed 3.39
7% 14.3 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 38.7%
Great: 55%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
823GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
98.1% Outstanding
Read 167
Write 175
Mixed 156
124% 166 MB/s
4K Read 1.26
4K Write 2.73
4K Mixed 0.32
139% 1.44 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 98.1%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$37
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
102% Outstanding
MC Read 40.8
MC Write 38.3
MC Mixed 27.6
102% 35.6 GB/s
SC Read 24.2
SC Write 40.8
SC Mixed 33
93% 32.7 GB/s
Latency 45.5
88% 45.5 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 102%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z370 Taichi Builds (Compare 971 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 111%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock Z370 Taichi - $330

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $1,120
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback