Asus H61M-C

Performance Results


Gaming 36% Jet ski	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 28% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	53.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	49.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus H61M-C (all builds)
Memory	5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140701
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 28 '18 at 21:04
Run Duration	145 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3570K-$136 185,516 User benchmarks, average bench 68% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	60.6% Good	Memory 82.9 1-Core 97.8 2-Core 196 72% 126 Pts	4-Core 209 8-Core 316 33% 263 Pts	64-Core 271 17% 271 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 60.6% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 390-$325 82,117 User benchmarks, average bench 50% XFX(1682 9390) CLim: 1015 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 18.3.4 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	53.8% Above average	Lighting 65.8 Reflection 59.9 Parallax 86.5 54% 70.8 fps	MRender 60.5 Gravity 54.3 Splatting 77.8 54% 64.2 fps
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 53.8% Great: 52%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 87GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 311 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 116 (B1) Unknown 99 99 5 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 68 59 32 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 23 (F1) Unknown 99 99 2244431024	49.5% Average	Read 268 Write 194 Mixed 206 49% 222 MB/s	4K Read 19.2 4K Write 36.9 4K Mixed 13.4 66% 23.2 MB/s	DQ Read 182 DQ Write 154 DQ Mixed 12.7 52% 116 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 49.5% Great: 124%
WD Blue 750GB (2008)-$72 4,659 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 218GB free Firmware: 30.04G30 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 180 179 7983 (04) Start/Stop count 93 93 7778 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 63 63 27639 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3349 (C0) Power-off retract count 199 199 995 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 198 198 8256 (C2) HDA temperature 127 78 25 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	42.2% Average	Read 75.2 Write 71.6 Mixed 76.3 56% 74.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.47 4K Write 1.74 4K Mixed 0.38 95% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 42.2% Great: 52%
Hitachi HUA723020ALA640 2TB-$41 7,860 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 182GB free Firmware: MK7OA800 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 135 135 85 (03) Spinup time 125 125 42982375922 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 1559 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 123 123 31 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 3683 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 698 (C0) Power-off retract count 99 99 1559 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 99 99 1559 (C2) HDA temperature 230 230 197569740826 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	48% Average	Read 78.9 Write 87.9 Mixed 69.6 59% 78.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.74 4K Write 1.88 4K Mixed 0.43 114% 1.02 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 48% Great: 83%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Patriot PSD34G160081 2x4GB 2,742 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	51.5% Above average	MC Read 17.8 MC Write 19.3 MC Mixed 17.2 52% 18.1 GB/s	SC Read 12.7 SC Write 14.6 SC Mixed 15 40% 14.1 GB/s	Latency 75.3 53% 75.3 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 51.5% Great: 59%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H61M-C Builds (Compare 757 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 59%

Gunboat

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H61M-C - $105

CPU
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	109x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	86x
Core i3-3240IntelBench 55%, 37,789 samples	77x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	117x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	51x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	32x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	21x
SU650 120GBAdata $14Bench 63%, 42,288 samples	21x
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	16x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	16x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	11x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	10x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $192

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16