Toshiba WT200

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 6%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 11%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics0.41% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive24.3% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (93%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemToshiba WT200  (all builds)
MotherboardTOSHIBA QCJ10
Memory0.3 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120220
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 07 '16 at 09:04
Run Duration225 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 93%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Atom N2600
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
11% Very poor
Memory 19.5
1-Core 5.6
2-Core 11
9% 12 Pts
4-Core 13.9
8-Core 20.6
2% 17.2 Pts
64-Core 22
1% 22 Pts
Poor: 13%
This bench: 11%
Great: 25%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Graphics Media Accelerator 3600
Toshiba(1179 FDCC)
Driver: igdumd32.dll Ver. 8.14.8.1075
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.41% Terrible
Lighting 0.77
Reflection 0.5
Parallax 0.34
1% 0.54 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.41%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba HG5d Q Series mSATA 256GB-$167
101GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HTTA Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
24.3% Poor
Read 143
Write 47.9
Mixed 85.3
20% 91.9 MB/s
4K Read 11.4
4K Write 17.6
4K Mixed 13.7
44% 14.2 MB/s
DQ Read 40.9
DQ Write 39.1
DQ Mixed 19.9
20% 33.3 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 24.3%
Great: 92%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5773DH0-CH9 1x2GB
1 of 2 slots used
2GB SODIMM DDR3 800 MHz
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
9.25% Terrible
MC Read 4.2
MC Write 3.2
MC Mixed 3
10% 3.47 GB/s
SC Read 1
SC Write 2.2
SC Mixed 0.1
3% 1.1 GB/s
Latency 324
12% 324 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 9.25%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback