Asrock 970M Pro3

Performance Results


Gaming 60% Destroyer	Desktop 70% Battleship	Workstation 50% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	93.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asrock 970M Pro3 (all builds)
Memory	11 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160617
Uptime	3.9 Days
Run Date	Apr 28 '18 at 11:51
Run Duration	118 Seconds
Run User	AUT-User
Background CPU	19%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8350-$130 313,196 User benchmarks, average bench 61% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	64.4% Good	Memory 82.9 1-Core 71.4 2-Core 134 59% 96.2 Pts	4-Core 249 8-Core 445 42% 347 Pts	64-Core 443 27% 443 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 64.4% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% Nvidia(10DE 119E) CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	93.5% Outstanding	Lighting 114 Reflection 145 Parallax 136 93% 132 fps	MRender 110 Gravity 132 Splatting 107 95% 116 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 93.5% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 86GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 8053 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 63 (B1) Unknown 99 99 5 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 65 58 35 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 22 (F1) Unknown 99 99 2994993642	77.1% Very good	Read 476 Write 375 Mixed 399 93% 417 MB/s	4K Read 37.7 4K Write 55.9 4K Mixed 19.8 112% 37.8 MB/s	DQ Read 37.1 DQ Write 68.4 DQ Mixed 27.7 28% 44.4 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 77.1% Great: 124%
OOS1000G 1TB 4,080 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 295GB free (System drive) Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 118 98 196446048 (03) Spinup time 98 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 122 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 24 (07) Seek error rate 83 60 4512267368 (09) Power-on hours count 82 82 16142 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 121 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 1 1 164 (BC) Unknown 100 99 13 (BD) vendor-specific 69 69 31 (BE) vendor-specific 68 55 9162063904 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 55 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 122 (C2) HDA temperature 32 45 -140737488355296 (C5) Current pending sector count 97 97 496 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 97 97 496 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	76.7% Very good	Read 149 Write 119 Mixed 136 102% 135 MB/s	4K Read 0.51 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.15 59% 0.59 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 76.7% Great: 110%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CT102464BA160B.M16 BLT8G3D1869DT1TX0. 16GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 1066, 1066 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	39.9% Below average	MC Read 14.7 MC Write 13.5 MC Mixed 13.5 40% 13.9 GB/s	SC Read 8.8 SC Write 9.1 SC Mixed 11.4 28% 9.77 GB/s	Latency 75.4 53% 75.4 ns
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 39.9% Great: 40%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 970M Pro3 Builds (Compare 843 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 22%

Surfboard

Desktop 68%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 18%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970M Pro3

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	289x
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	228x
FX-8320AMD $175Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	70x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	92x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	51x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	47x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	27x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	18x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	14x

RAM
TEAMGROUP-UD3-1600 2x8GBUnknownBench 52%, 6,864 samples	35x
NMUD380D81-1600C 1x8GBUnknownBench 28%, 485 samples	26x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	24x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 80% - Very good

Total price: $217

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16