Iqon.ie MS-7267

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 19%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics14.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemIqon.ie MS-7267  (all builds)
MotherboardMSI MS-7267
Memory0.5 GB free of 2 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20070711
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateApr 27 '18 at 10:08
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 38%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium Dual E2140-$103
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
32.7% Below average
Memory 60.5
1-Core 15.1
2-Core 28.4
27% 34.7 Pts
4-Core 31.9
8-Core 31.2
4% 31.5 Pts
64-Core 29.6
2% 29.6 Pts
Poor: 15%
This bench: 32.7%
Great: 39%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 6870
Sapphire(174B 174B) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
14.5% Very poor
Lighting 19.2
Reflection 13.9
Parallax 17.7
16% 16.9 fps
MRender 11.6
Gravity 14.4
Splatting 17.5
12% 14.5 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 14.5%
Great: 16%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$80
254GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.03A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
46.8% Average
Read 77.6
Write 85.2
Mixed 30.6
47% 64.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.59
4K Write 1.86
4K Mixed 0.36
99% 0.94 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 46.8%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x1GB
2 of 4 slots used
2GB DIMM SDRAM
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
11.3% Very poor
MC Read 4.1
MC Write 3.3
MC Mixed 3.2
10% 3.53 GB/s
SC Read 2.8
SC Write 2.3
SC Mixed 0.8
6% 1.97 GB/s
Latency 126
32% 126 ns
Poor: 6%
This bench: 11.3%
Great: 20%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback