Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics33.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive78.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsus M5A99FX PRO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140407
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateApr 27 '18 at 03:48
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
66.3% Good
Memory 88.5
1-Core 70.1
2-Core 134
61% 97.5 Pts
4-Core 239
8-Core 438
40% 339 Pts
64-Core 435
27% 435 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 66.3%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 280X-$500
Asus(1043 0446) 3GB
CLim: 925 MHz, MLim: 1375 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 18.3.4
Performing below potential (42nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
33.9% Below average
Lighting 44.4
Reflection 29.6
Parallax 54.4
36% 42.8 fps
MRender 28.2
Gravity 42.9
Splatting 36.3
30% 35.8 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 33.9%
Great: 39%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
276GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
78.2% Very good
Read 471
Write 375
Mixed 396
92% 414 MB/s
4K Read 35.7
4K Write 63.5
4K Mixed 21.7
116% 40.3 MB/s
DQ Read 39
DQ Write 66
DQ Mixed 54.3
41% 53.1 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 78.2%
Great: 134%
WD Blue 2.5" 640GB (2010)-$60
596GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
47.6% Average
Read 83.5
Write 82.4
Mixed 81
62% 82.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.53
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.2
72% 0.74 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 47.6%
Great: 48%
HGST Travelstar 5K1000 2.5" 1TB
520GB free
Firmware: JA0OA560 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
50% Average
Read 83.6
Write 90.5
Mixed 91.8
67% 88.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.34
4K Write 1.37
4K Mixed 0.16
57% 0.62 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 50%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance Pro DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
48.5% Average
MC Read 19.8
MC Write 15
MC Mixed 17.2
50% 17.3 GB/s
SC Read 10.7
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 13.2
31% 10.8 GB/s
Latency 69
58% 69 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 48.5%
Great: 76%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A99FX PRO R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,063 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0 - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $610
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback