Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 39% Jet ski	Desktop 91% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 36% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	34.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	65.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING (all builds)
Memory	14.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180413
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 26 '18 at 23:13
Run Duration	169 Seconds
Run User	CZE-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X-$120 142,983 User benchmarks, average bench 74% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	88.6% Excellent	Memory 87.2 1-Core 128 2-Core 252 86% 156 Pts	4-Core 484 8-Core 792 78% 638 Pts	64-Core 1,014 63% 1,014 Pts
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 88.6% Great: 86%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 7950-$290 33,820 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Gigabyte(1458 254C) 3GB CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 18.3.4 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	34.2% Below average	Lighting 44.5 Reflection 32.1 Parallax 55.8 36% 44.1 fps	MRender 30.4 Gravity 38.5 Splatting 40 30% 36.3 fps
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 34.2% Great: 32%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Blue 500GB-$94 19,345 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 465GB free Firmware: X41100WD Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 5970 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 40 (A5) Unknown 100 100 52298374 (A6) Unknown 100 100 1 (A7) Unknown 100 100 36 (A8) Unknown 100 100 11 (A9) Unknown 100 100 481 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 3 (AE) Unknown 100 100 21 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 64 52 223339675684 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 1460291633492 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (E9) Unknown 100 100 1654 (EA) Unknown 100 100 7019 (F1) Unknown 253 253 4686 (F2) Unknown 253 253 3786 (F4) Unknown 0 100 0	73.8% Very good	Read 501 Write 356 Mixed 338 88% 398 MB/s	4K Read 33.6 4K Write 57.3 4K Mixed 11.4 96% 34.1 MB/s	DQ Read 29.9 DQ Write 189 DQ Mixed 45.7 54% 88.3 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 73.8% Great: 107%
Kingston HyperX 3K 240GB-$70 27,495 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 197GB free (System drive) Firmware: 526ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 47087890 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 -721554501541 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 2 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 938 (B1) Unknown 0 0 3 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 36 94 55840735268 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 47087890 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 47087890 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 47087890 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 7210 (EA) Unknown 0 0 9099 (F1) Unknown 0 0 9099 (F2) Unknown 0 0 20207	65.7% Good	Read 497 Write 244 Mixed 281 75% 341 MB/s	4K Read 28.9 4K Write 79.5 4K Mixed 11.8 101% 40.1 MB/s	DQ Read 27 DQ Write 71.6 DQ Mixed 11.7 20% 36.8 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 65.7% Great: 94%
Apple TS256C 251GB 638 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 30GB free Firmware: CJAA0201 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (49^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 99 99 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 9547 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 4293 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 0 (A9) Unknown 100 100 1005239340015 (AA) Unknown 100 100 137455468626 (AB) Unknown 100 100 234 (AD) Unknown 192 192 4311810158 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 154 (C2) HDA temperature 72 41 253403987996 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0	38.2% Below average	Read 223 Write 166 Mixed 186 43% 192 MB/s	4K Read 15.7 4K Write 43.5 4K Mixed 11 61% 23.4 MB/s	DQ Read 14.9 DQ Write 41.8 DQ Mixed 9.14 12% 22 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 38.2% Great: 50%
WD Black 2TB (2010)-$107 47,617 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 1.5TB free Firmware: 05.01D05 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (74^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 253 253 7108 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 858 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 46 46 39436 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 856 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 437 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 420 (C2) HDA temperature 115 101 37 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 8	75.3% Very good	Read 153 Write 109 Mixed 107 92% 123 MB/s	4K Read 0.83 4K Write 2.44 4K Mixed 0.32 115% 1.19 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 75.3% Great: 85%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x8GB 99,207 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 3400 MHz clocked @ 1700 MHz Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	109% Outstanding	MC Read 45.8 MC Write 39.4 MC Mixed 33.6 113% 39.6 GB/s	SC Read 25.9 SC Write 41.4 SC Mixed 29.4 92% 32.2 GB/s	Latency 70.3 57% 70.3 ns
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 109% Great: 110%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING Builds (Compare 3,848 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 82%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 80%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING - $190

CPU
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	1,430x
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $199Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	305x
Ryzen 5 2600XAMD $120Bench 74%, 142,983 samples	280x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	233x
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	229x
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	202x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	189x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	188x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	176x

RAM
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $56Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	201x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	142x
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	134x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 73% - Very good

Total price: $1,014

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING

Performance Results

PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING - $190

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)