MSI A88XI AC V2 (MS-7913)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics35.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive44.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
SystemMSI MS-7913
MotherboardMSI A88XI AC V2 (MS-7913)  (all builds)
Memory11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20160727
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateApr 26 '18 at 20:31
Run Duration271 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-7870K APU (2014 D.Ka)-$135
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
55.5% Above average
Memory 75.3
1-Core 68.3
2-Core 128
55% 90.7 Pts
4-Core 209
8-Core 210
28% 209 Pts
64-Core 209
13% 209 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 55.5%
Great: 55%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 380-$200
CLim: 980 MHz, MLim: 1425 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver:
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
35.8% Below average
Lighting 45.3
Reflection 50.4
Parallax 54.2
37% 50 fps
MRender 49.8
Gravity 39.8
Splatting 36
34% 41.8 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 35.8%
Great: 35%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk S128G 126GB
57GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.1.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
44.3% Average
Read 478
Write 230
Mixed 240
69% 316 MB/s
4K Read 11.6
4K Write 12.9
4K Mixed 7.06
33% 10.5 MB/s
DQ Read 38.8
DQ Write 15.2
DQ Mixed 6.78
10% 20.2 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 44.3%
Great: 56%
WD Black 2.5" 750GB (2013)-$65
548GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
70.4% Very good
Read 139
Write 106
Mixed 116
91% 121 MB/s
4K Read 0.34
4K Write 2.05
4K Mixed 0.15
69% 0.85 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 70.4%
Great: 71%
WD Black 2.5" 750GB (2011)-$87
72GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
42.3% Average
Read 70.9
Write 76.2
Mixed 74.1
56% 73.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.66
4K Write 1.94
4K Mixed 0.22
88% 0.94 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 42.3%
Great: 71%
WD Elements 1TB
277GB free, PID 1078
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
31.1% Below average
Read 62.2
Write 73.7
Mixed 46.6
78% 60.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.54
4K Write 1.92
4K Mixed 0.23
75% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 31.1%
Great: 43%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
150GB free, PID 0202
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
43.4% Average
Read 105
Write 105
Mixed 83.3
124% 97.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.25
4K Write 1.73
4K Mixed 0.19
66% 0.72 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 43.4%
Great: 45%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 64GB-$9
58GB free, PID 5581
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
42.3% Average
Read 131
Write 67.2
Mixed 87.5
112% 95.3 MB/s
4K Read 5.44
4K Write 2.38
4K Mixed 1.14
140% 2.99 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 42.3%
Great: 39%
SanDisk Ultra Flair USB 3.0 64GB-$7
57GB free, PID 5591
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
43.2% Average
Read 146
Write 61.2
Mixed 86.9
112% 98.1 MB/s
4K Read 7.86
4K Write 2.22
4K Mixed 0.55
123% 3.54 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 43.2%
Great: 40%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
40% Average
MC Read 17.5
MC Write 8.2
MC Mixed 17
41% 14.2 GB/s
SC Read 8.9
SC Write 8.3
SC Mixed 12
28% 9.73 GB/s
Latency 89.8
44% 89.8 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 40%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A88XI AC V2 (MS-7913) Builds (Compare 20 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI A88XI AC V2 (MS-7913)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $224
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback