Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5

Performance Results


Gaming 104% UFO	Desktop 88% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 103% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	121% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	210% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5 (all builds)
Memory	12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180315
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Apr 26 '18 at 16:25
Run Duration	163 Seconds
Run User	ZAF-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X-$60 30,050 User benchmarks, average bench 72% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	82.4% Excellent	Memory 82.9 1-Core 112 2-Core 224 78% 140 Pts	4-Core 441 8-Core 765 73% 603 Pts	64-Core 1,254 78% 1,254 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 82.4% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Nvidia(10DE 1B06) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing below potential (40^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	121% Outstanding	Lighting 163 Reflection 197 Parallax 179 133% 180 fps	MRender 124 Gravity 178 Splatting 124 115% 142 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 121% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SHSS37A480G 480GB 14,802 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 305GB free Firmware: SAFM001B Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 21562 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 304 (A8) Unknown 100 100 0 (AA) Unknown 100 100 1229 (AD) Unknown 100 100 3866751 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 8323131 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 125 (C2) HDA temperature 62 45 236224512038 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (DA) Unknown 100 100 0 (E7) Temperature 100 100 99 (E9) Unknown 100 100 28542 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0 (F1) Unknown 100 100 21695 (F2) Unknown 100 100 14961 (F4) Unknown 100 100 59 (F5) Unknown 100 100 127 (F6) Unknown 100 100 8149312	88% Excellent	Read 514 Write 508 Mixed 509 114% 510 MB/s	4K Read 27 4K Write 74.1 4K Mixed 13.5 97% 38.2 MB/s	DQ Read 151 DQ Write 229 DQ Mixed 13.8 60% 131 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 88% Great: 110%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45 240,629 User benchmarks, average bench 199% 145GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	210% Outstanding	Read 2,034 Write 1,210 Mixed 1,194 326% 1,479 MB/s	4K Read 48.3 4K Write 92.8 4K Mixed 26 156% 55.7 MB/s	DQ Read 249 DQ Write 175 DQ Mixed 20 67% 148 MB/s
Poor: 142% ↑ This bench: 210% Great: 236%
Kingston HyperX 3K 240GB-$70 27,495 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 141GB free Firmware: 60AABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 5595353 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 79 79 18966575598407 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 312 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 145 (B1) Unknown 0 0 99 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 33 42 85902098465 (C2) HDA temperature 33 42 85902098465 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 5595353 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 5595353 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 5595353 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 94 94 1 (E9) Unknown 0 0 12639 (EA) Unknown 0 0 4434 (F1) Unknown 0 0 4434 (F2) Unknown 0 0 1874	83% Excellent	Read 511 Write 247 Mixed 307 78% 355 MB/s	4K Read 30.1 4K Write 90.4 4K Mixed 24.2 124% 48.2 MB/s	DQ Read 243 DQ Write 236 DQ Mixed 86.9 107% 189 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 83% Great: 94%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 1.5TB free Firmware: CC29 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 114 99 72497544 (03) Spinup time 97 96 0 (04) Start/Stop count 92 92 8626 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 73 60 21850810 (09) Power-on hours count 74 74 23645 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 311 (B7) Unknown 99 99 1 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 91 575 (BD) vendor-specific 93 93 7 (BE) vendor-specific 64 54 39260586020 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 117 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 44 44 112622 (C2) HDA temperature 36 46 -140737488355292 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 196 423 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -118360708735008 (F1) Unknown 100 253 29635803821 (F2) Unknown 100 253 43179366164	67.6% Good	Read 114 Write 121 Mixed 103 85% 113 MB/s	4K Read 0.45 4K Write 1.28 4K Mixed 0.23 68% 0.65 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 67.6% Great: 114%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$40 653,654 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	105% Outstanding	MC Read 43.8 MC Write 37.2 MC Mixed 33.3 109% 38.1 GB/s	SC Read 24.8 SC Write 40.3 SC Mixed 28.7 89% 31.3 GB/s	Latency 75.4 53% 75.4 ns
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 110%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-AX370-Gaming 5 Builds (Compare 678 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 90%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 80%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 87%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5 - $246

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	100x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	88x
Ryzen 7 1800XAMD $60Bench 72%, 30,050 samples	75x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	70x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	52x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	49x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	27x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	23x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	17x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	37x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	23x
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GBG.SKILL $73Bench 98%, 54,616 samples	13x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 76% - Very good

Total price: $1,061

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5

Performance Results

PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5 - $246

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)