Asus P8Z77-V PRO/THUNDERBOLT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics37.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive86.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8Z77-V PRO/THUNDERBOLT  (all builds)
Memory5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130813
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 26 '18 at 16:06
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User LTU-User
Background CPU 32%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770K-$175
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
81.2% Excellent
Memory 95.3
1-Core 108
2-Core 205
80% 136 Pts
4-Core 364
8-Core 547
57% 455 Pts
64-Core 547
34% 547 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 81.2%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
CLim: 1493 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 397.31
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
37.4% Below average
Lighting 48.7
Reflection 45.6
Parallax 42.3
40% 45.5 fps
MRender 40.2
Gravity 43
Splatting 37.8
33% 40.3 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 37.4%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
169GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
86.3% Excellent
Read 517
Write 417
Mixed 308
92% 414 MB/s
4K Read 38.9
4K Write 71.9
4K Mixed 23.5
127% 44.8 MB/s
DQ Read 40.1
DQ Write 83.6
DQ Mixed 23.6
29% 49.1 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 86.3%
Great: 124%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$50
193GB free
Firmware: MX4OABB0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
85.4% Excellent
Read 169
Write 128
Mixed 28.9
79% 109 MB/s
4K Read 0.72
4K Write 2.14
4K Mixed 0.17
89% 1.01 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 85.4%
Great: 108%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24
162GB free
Firmware: 18.01H18 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
40% Average
Read 71.5
Write 67.7
Mixed 12.2
36% 50.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.62
4K Write 1.62
4K Mixed 0.29
88% 0.84 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 40%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1866 C9 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
34.2% Below average
MC Read 11.2
MC Write 10.2
MC Mixed 9.8
30% 10.4 GB/s
SC Read 11.4
SC Write 11.4
SC Mixed 11.6
33% 11.5 GB/s
Latency 56.3
71% 56.3 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 34.2%
Great: 38%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8Z77-V PRO/THUNDERBOLT Builds (Compare 157 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus P8Z77-V PRO/THUNDERBOLT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $386
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback