Gigabyte GA-X99P-SLI-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 28% Raft	Desktop 90% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 27% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	21.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	60.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-X99P-SLI-CF (all builds)
Memory	27.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20151112
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 26 '18 at 14:55
Run Duration	265 Seconds
Run User	CZE-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130 101,694 User benchmarks, average bench 77% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	91.3% Outstanding	Memory 90.3 1-Core 107 2-Core 254 83% 151 Pts	4-Core 496 8-Core 812 80% 654 Pts	64-Core 997 62% 997 Pts
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 91.3% Great: 88%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170 123,956 User benchmarks, average bench 20% Gigabyte(1458 354E) 2GB CLim: 1254 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.1 Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	21.1% Poor	Lighting 24.5 Reflection 23 Parallax 29.7 20% 25.7 fps	MRender 32.8 Gravity 29.1 Splatting 24.7 23% 28.9 fps
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 21.1% Great: 21%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston HyperX 3K 240GB-$70 27,495 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 33GB free (System drive) Firmware: 506ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 105 105 11449623 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 90 90 36893769081434 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1797 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 112 (B1) Unknown 0 0 5 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 29 78 73019555869 (C2) HDA temperature 29 78 73019555869 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 11449623 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 11449623 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 11449623 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 13722 (EA) Unknown 0 0 6809 (F1) Unknown 0 0 6809 (F2) Unknown 0 0 4547	60.1% Good	Read 478 Write 208 Mixed 209 65% 298 MB/s	4K Read 20.6 4K Write 53.8 4K Mixed 9.61 72% 28 MB/s	DQ Read 144 DQ Write 202 DQ Mixed 8.28 52% 118 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 60.1% Great: 94%
Seagate ST4000VM000-1F3168 4TB 603 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 129GB free Firmware: SC25 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 113 99 57324048 (03) Spinup time 93 91 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 882 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 72 60 20533722 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 4154 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 882 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 71 71 29 (BE) vendor-specific 68 57 538705952 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 47 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 882 (C2) HDA temperature 32 43 77309411360 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	47.5% Average	Read 76.2 Write 89.1 Mixed 84.1 63% 83.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.29 4K Mixed 0.13 59% 0.64 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 47.5% Great: 102%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$65 103,919 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 6GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 169 163 6541 (04) Start/Stop count 95 95 5690 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 79 79 15573 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2920 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 37 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 199 199 5660 (C2) HDA temperature 119 90 31 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	27.6% Poor	Read 57.4 Write 38.4 Mixed 75.1 44% 57 MB/s	4K Read 0.34 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.37 86% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 27.6% Great: 57%
StoreJet Transcend 500GB 1,300 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 10GB free, PID 2329 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	14.6% Very poor	Read 37.3 Write 34.1 Mixed 35.4 46% 35.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.37 4K Write 0.54 4K Mixed 0.15 25% 0.35 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 14.6% Great: 20%
ADATA HD720 1TB 512 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 9GB free, PID a51a Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	19.7% Very poor	Read 55.6 Write 48.8 Mixed 49 65% 51.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.31 4K Mixed 0.18 18% 0.3 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 19.7% Great: 49%
ADATA HD720 1TB 512 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 3GB free, PID a51a Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	30.1% Below average	Read 79.8 Write 68.8 Mixed 51.3 82% 66.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 1.12 4K Mixed 0.17 45% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 30.1% Great: 49%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 4x8GB-$165 6,271 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 4 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	108% Outstanding	MC Read 41.5 MC Write 42.9 MC Mixed 40.4 119% 41.6 GB/s	SC Read 15.9 SC Write 23.5 SC Mixed 22 58% 20.5 GB/s	Latency 66.8 60% 66.8 ns
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 108% Great: 113%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X99P-SLI-CF Builds (Compare 313 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 70%

Battleship

Desktop 89%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 63%

Destroyer

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X99P-SLI-CF

CPU
Core i7-6800KIntel $78Bench 81%, 50,196 samples	110x
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples	60x
Core i7-6850KIntel $115Bench 84%, 29,279 samples	30x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	37x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	35x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	22x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	16x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	12x
950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $625Bench 223%, 54,978 samples	11x

RAM
DDR4 3000 2OZ 4x8GBUnknownBench 87%, 1,963 samples	14x
HMA41GR7MFR4N-TF 4x8GBHynixBench 90%, 782 samples	10x
Ripjaws V DDR4 2666 C15 4x8GBG.SKILLBench 82%, 1,079 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 128% - Outstanding

Total price: $305

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16