Asus H170-PRO/USB 3.1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics31.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive73.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus H170-PRO/USB 3.1  (all builds)
Memory1.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161221
Uptime5.2 Days
Run DateApr 26 '18 at 09:47
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 19%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-6100-$40
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
66.2% Good
Memory 80.3
1-Core 114
2-Core 188
74% 127 Pts
4-Core 303
8-Core 302
40% 302 Pts
64-Core 302
19% 302 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 66.2%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Gigabyte(1458 3764) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 391.1
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
31.2% Below average
Lighting 39.3
Reflection 30.4
Parallax 36
32% 35.2 fps
MRender 37.7
Gravity 36.7
Splatting 34.7
30% 36.4 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 31.2%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 120GB-$35
29GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
73.7% Very good
Read 485
Write 266
Mixed 273
75% 342 MB/s
4K Read 35.2
4K Write 53.6
4K Mixed 19.9
107% 36.2 MB/s
DQ Read 223
DQ Write 69.8
DQ Mixed 59.8
67% 118 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 73.7%
Great: 110%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39
561GB free
Firmware: CC43 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
96.5% Outstanding
Read 179
Write 158
Mixed 144
120% 160 MB/s
4K Read 0.67
4K Write 1.62
4K Mixed 0.3
91% 0.86 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 96.5%
Great: 113%
WD Blue 250GB (2007)-$20
37GB free
Firmware: 02.03E02 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
33.4% Below average
Read 53.1
Write 63
Mixed 52.9
42% 56.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.52
4K Write 1.54
4K Mixed 0.3
84% 0.79 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 33.4%
Great: 55%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT4G4DFS8213.C8FBD2 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
36.6% Below average
MC Read 12.9
MC Write 12.5
MC Mixed 10.7
34% 12 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 12.8
SC Mixed 11.4
35% 12.1 GB/s
Latency 79.9
50% 79.9 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 36.6%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H170-PRO/USB 3.1 Builds (Compare 121 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H170-PRO/USB 3.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $245
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback