Gigabyte GA-F2A75M-D3H

Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 58% Gunboat	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	9.79% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	73.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-F2A75M-D3H (all builds)
Memory	6.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 色彩
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20131215
Uptime	1.5 Days
Run Date	Apr 26 '18 at 06:22
Run Duration	419 Seconds
Run User	HKG-User
Background CPU	17%

PC Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon II X4 740K 4,318 User benchmarks, average bench 49% P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	54.5% Above average	Memory 88.3 1-Core 59.1 2-Core 89.9 53% 79.1 Pts	4-Core 116 8-Core 170 18% 143 Pts	64-Core 175 11% 175 Pts
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 54.5% Great: 57%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 550-Ti-$250 54,392 User benchmarks, average bench 9% Asus(1043 83C2) 1GB CLim: 900 MHz, MLim: 1026 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	9.79% Terrible	Lighting 11 Reflection 12.8 Parallax 9.22 9% 11 fps	MRender 15.2 Gravity 11.4 Splatting 15 11% 13.9 fps
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 9.79% Great: 9%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba Q300 Pro 256GB-$149 1,385 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 199GB free (System drive) Firmware: JURA0101 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 254 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1740 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 5105 (A9) Unknown 100 100 100 (AD) Unknown 199 199 0 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 1452 (C2) HDA temperature 72 58 180389740572 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0	73.4% Very good	Read 484 Write 437 Mixed 478 104% 466 MB/s	4K Read 18.9 4K Write 57.8 4K Mixed 17 81% 31.2 MB/s	DQ Read 22.5 DQ Write 119 DQ Mixed 17.7 29% 53 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 73.4% Great: 102%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60 112,929 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 477GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (81^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 193 176 5350 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2712 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 90 90 7359 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1717 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 416 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 171 171 89335 (C2) HDA temperature 123 99 27 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 3 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	73.8% Very good	Read 138 Write 119 Mixed 124 96% 127 MB/s	4K Read 0.82 4K Write 2.47 4K Mixed 0.22 104% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 73.8% Great: 83%
WD Black 1.5TB (2010) 6,983 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 484GB free Firmware: 05.01D05 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 253 253 7716 (04) Start/Stop count 95 95 5576 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 78 78 16365 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3239 (C0) Power-off retract count 199 199 909 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 199 199 4666 (C2) HDA temperature 123 91 29 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 1	82.2% Excellent	Read 148 Write 138 Mixed 136 106% 141 MB/s	4K Read 1.13 4K Write 2.41 4K Mixed 0.49 146% 1.34 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 82.2% Great: 85%
JetFlash Transcend 2GB 787 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 1GB free, PID 6387 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	4.77% Terrible	Read 18.1 Write 5.31 Mixed 1.46 8% 8.29 MB/s	4K Read 3.94 4K Write 0.02 4K Mixed 0.02 16% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 4.77% Great: 6%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Adata DDR3 1866G 2O 2x4GB 411 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	35.3% Below average	MC Read 16.3 MC Write 7.1 MC Mixed 12.9 35% 12.1 GB/s	SC Read 7.1 SC Write 5.4 SC Mixed 10.8 22% 7.77 GB/s	Latency 69.3 58% 69.3 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 35.3% Great: 39%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-F2A75M-D3H Builds (Compare 78 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 51%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-F2A75M-D3H

CPU
Athlon II X4 740KAMDBench 49%, 4,318 samples	23x
A4-5300 APUAMD $36Bench 40%, 7,032 samples	9x
A10-5800K APU (2012 D.Tr)AMD $119Bench 50%, 18,312 samples	9x

GPU
HD 7750AMDBench 8%, 22,655 samples	12x
GTX 650Nvidia $112Bench 8%, 69,673 samples	9x
Radeon HD 7660DAMDBench 5%, 7,665 samples	6x

SSD
0 500GBCt500mx5Bench 92%, 2,476 samples	4x
MX500 1TBCrucial $66Bench 106%, 202,785 samples	4x
M550 mSATA 512GBCrucial $458Bench 87%, 441 samples	4x

RAM
99P5471-002.A 4x2GBKingstonBench 29%, 47 samples	4x
SHARETRONIC 1x4GBUnknownBench 27%, 954 samples	4x
DDR3 1600G 4x2GBAdataBench 43%, 200 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16