Biostar TA870+

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics26% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive54.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardBiostar TA870+  (all builds)
Memory14 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110831
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 25 '18 at 23:50
Run Duration241 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 965-$144
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
62.8% Good
Memory 87.1
1-Core 56.2
2-Core 113
55% 85.4 Pts
4-Core 224
8-Core 229
30% 226 Pts
64-Core 223
14% 223 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 62.8%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 560-$500
XFX(1682 9560) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1295 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 18.3.4
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
26% Poor
Lighting 31.7
Reflection 33.1
Parallax 39.3
26% 34.7 fps
MRender 31.4
Gravity 29.8
Splatting 34.6
26% 31.9 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 26%
Great: 25%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 275GB-$100
151GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0CR060 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
54.9% Above average
Read 421
Write 294
Mixed 306
76% 340 MB/s
4K Read 17.3
4K Write 44.1
4K Mixed 11
64% 24.1 MB/s
DQ Read 19.3
DQ Write 49.3
DQ Mixed 8.36
14% 25.7 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 54.9%
Great: 95%
OCZ Vertex 3 120GB-$42
112GB free
Firmware: 2.25 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
26.6% Poor
Read 100
Write 98
Mixed 98.5
22% 98.8 MB/s
4K Read 16.6
4K Write 33.4
4K Mixed 8.29
53% 19.4 MB/s
DQ Read 15.3
DQ Write 35.5
DQ Mixed 11.4
13% 20.8 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 26.6%
Great: 82%
Plextor M5S 128GB-$75
31GB free
Firmware: 1.05 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
48.4% Average
Read 327
Write 204
Mixed 230
56% 254 MB/s
4K Read 22.7
4K Write 41.7
4K Mixed 11.8
72% 25.4 MB/s
DQ Read 28.6
DQ Write 60.1
DQ Mixed 10.7
18% 33.1 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 48.4%
Great: 84%
Hitachi HDS5C3030ALA630 3TB-$124
1.5TB free
Firmware: MEAOA580 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
35.2% Below average
Read 60.7
Write 61.8
Mixed 73.2
50% 65.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.29
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.24
62% 0.58 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 35.2%
Great: 66%
Toshiba P300 3TB-$100
1.5TB free
Firmware: MX6OACF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
76.6% Very good
Read 132
Write 135
Mixed 129
99% 132 MB/s
4K Read 0.65
4K Write 1.75
4K Mixed 0.22
84% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 76.6%
Great: 108%
WD Black 500GB (2008)-$95
156GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
56.7% Above average
Read 97
Write 101
Mixed 100
75% 99.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.77
4K Write 1.69
4K Mixed 0.42
110% 0.96 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 56.7%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
34.2% Below average
MC Read 14.8
MC Write 7.5
MC Mixed 12.6
33% 11.6 GB/s
SC Read 7.5
SC Write 6.2
SC Mixed 9.6
22% 7.77 GB/s
Latency 70.4
57% 70.4 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 34.2%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TA870+ Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Biostar TA870+

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 43% - Average Total price: $263
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback