Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive	209% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

6 years ago, 4 years ago.

PC Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-1650 v3 7,962 User benchmarks, average bench 77% CPU0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	79% Very good	Memory 87 1-Core 106 2-Core 202 76% 132 Pts	4-Core 382 8-Core 648 63% 515 Pts	64-Core 787 49% 787 Pts
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 79% Great: 83%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung SM951 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$69 12,601 User benchmarks, average bench 205% 313GB free (System drive) Firmware: BXW73H0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	209% Outstanding	Read 1,911 Write 813 Mixed 1,126 282% 1,284 MB/s	4K Read 39.3 4K Write 142 4K Mixed 58.3 209% 79.8 MB/s	DQ Read 491 DQ Write 313 DQ Mixed 201 204% 335 MB/s
Poor: 136% ↑ This bench: 209% Great: 262%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393A1G40DB0-CPB Hynix HMA41GR7MFR4N-TF M393A1G40DB0-CPB 24GB 18 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	80.3% Excellent	MC Read 32.5 MC Write 29.9 MC Mixed 28 86% 30.1 GB/s	SC Read 12.6 SC Write 19.5 SC Mixed 19.3 49% 17.1 GB/s	Latency 70.5 57% 70.5 ns
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 80.3% Great: 80%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 18%

Surfboard

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 16%

Surfboard

GPU
Quadro K2200Nvidia $440Bench 16%, 13,860 samples	739x
Quadro M4000NvidiaBench 32%, 9,043 samples	376x
Quadro K4200Nvidia $820Bench 21%, 7,330 samples	223x

SSD
SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 238%, 21,542 samples	144x
SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBSamsungBench 219%, 21,747 samples	129x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	122x

RAM
M393A1G40DB0-CPB 2x8GBSamsungBench 60%, 1,030 samples	184x
M393A1G40DB0-CPB 4x8GBSamsungBench 93%, 970 samples	177x
M393A2G40DB0-CPB 2x16GBSamsungBench 59%, 1,132 samples	157x

Value: 9% - Terrible

Total price: $440

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16