PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
Graphics | 32% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 84.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen. |
System | HP Z440 Workstation (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 212B |
Memory | 12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
Display | 1360 x 768 - 32 Bit kolorów |
OS | Windows 8.1 |
BIOS Date | 20180125 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Apr 25 '18 at 16:11 |
Run Duration | 120 Seconds |
Run User | POL-User |
Background CPU | 1% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3
CPU0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
|
82.5%
Excellent
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 8613) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 397.31
|
32%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Spcc Solid State Disk 120GB
63GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 7A0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
|
84.5%
Excellent
|
|||
63.2%
Good
|
||||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung M393A1G40DB0-CPB 2x8GB
2 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
|
61.6%
Good
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Xeon E5-1620 v3IntelBench 72%, 10,197 samples | 1,227x |
Xeon E5-1650 v4IntelBench 83%, 3,842 samples | 1,026x |
Xeon E5-1650 v3IntelBench 77%, 7,962 samples | 854x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Quadro K2200Nvidia $440Bench 16%, 13,860 samples | 735x |
Quadro M4000NvidiaBench 32%, 9,043 samples | 373x |
Quadro K4200Nvidia $820Bench 21%, 7,330 samples | 222x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 9% - Terrible | Total price: $440 |