| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 9.06% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus PRIME A320M-K (all builds) |
| Memory | 4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20180413 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Apr 25 '18 at 10:56 |
| Run Duration | 151 Seconds |
| Run User | AUS-User |
| Background CPU | 27% |
PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
77.3%
Very good
|
74% 126 Pts
|
72% 604 Pts
|
61% 983 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 260-$250
Gigabyte(1458 34CA) 896MB
Ram: 896MB, Driver: 334.89
|
9.06%
Terrible
|
10% 9.3 fps
|
7% 8.8 fps
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston 9905702-006.A00G 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing below potential (90th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
40.9%
Average
|
39% 13.7 GB/s
|
40% 14.2 GB/s
|
45% 89.5 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical PRIME A320M-K Builds (Compare 12,034 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-K - $70
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Ryzen 5 2600AMD $125Bench 73%, 179,588 samples | 1,461x |
| Ryzen 3 3200GAMD $75Bench 63%, 104,122 samples | 1,304x |
| Ryzen 3 2200GAMD $104Bench 60%, 181,631 samples | 1,006x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 949x |
| RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples | 734x |
| GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples | 653x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 103% - Outstanding | Total price: $322 |