Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 51% Yacht	Desktop 86% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 48% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	55% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	253% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME X370-PRO (all builds)
Memory	10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180122
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Apr 25 '18 at 02:50
Run Duration	226 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	1%

Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 1600-$110 392,253 User benchmarks, average bench 70% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	79.6% Very good	Memory 75.4 1-Core 113 2-Core 227 77% 139 Pts	4-Core 450 8-Core 748 73% 599 Pts	64-Core 933 58% 933 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 79.6% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75 261,163 User benchmarks, average bench 46% Sapphire(174B E347) CLim: 1355 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 18.3.4 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	55% Above average	Lighting 69.7 Reflection 69.8 Parallax 86.8 57% 75.5 fps	MRender 68.3 Gravity 66.2 Splatting 57 52% 63.9 fps
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 55% Great: 53%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$190 68,849 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 375GB free Firmware: EXM04B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (70^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 10697 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1206 (B1) Unknown 99 99 20 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 74 58 26 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 78 (F1) Unknown 99 99 11552863061	111% Outstanding	Read 523 Write 500 Mixed 514 114% 512 MB/s	4K Read 34.6 4K Write 93.4 4K Mixed 46.3 161% 58.1 MB/s	DQ Read 187 DQ Write 226 DQ Mixed 23.8 69% 146 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 111% Great: 124%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 165,668 User benchmarks, average bench 213% 226GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	253% Outstanding	Read 2,729 Write 1,363 Mixed 1,435 405% 1,843 MB/s	4K Read 52.9 4K Write 108 4K Mixed 36.1 184% 65.9 MB/s	DQ Read 53.1 DQ Write 207 DQ Mixed 98.8 85% 120 MB/s
Poor: 153% ↑ This bench: 253% Great: 254%
Corsair Force GT 240GB-$499 4,125 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 121GB free Firmware: 5.02 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 102 102 5214516 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 1 (09) Power-on hours count 0 0 -123652108432029 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 2033 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 112 (B1) Unknown 0 0 5 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 28 53 42953146396 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 5214516 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 1 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 5214516 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 5214516 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 14249 (EA) Unknown 0 0 10072 (F1) Unknown 0 0 10072 (F2) Unknown 0 0 23088	76.5% Very good	Read 517 Write 247 Mixed 325 80% 363 MB/s	4K Read 28.7 4K Write 77.8 4K Mixed 15.9 105% 40.8 MB/s	DQ Read 265 DQ Write 202 DQ Mixed 73.8 99% 180 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 76.5% Great: 92%
Corsair Force GT 240GB-$499 4,125 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 95GB free Firmware: 5.02 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 105 105 11550940 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 0 0 59004260732266 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 2034 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 109 (B1) Unknown 0 0 7 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 28 63 42953801756 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 11550940 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 11550940 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 11550940 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 14695 (EA) Unknown 0 0 10342 (F1) Unknown 0 0 10342 (F2) Unknown 0 0 24034	78% Very good	Read 500 Write 252 Mixed 319 79% 357 MB/s	4K Read 29.7 4K Write 76.4 4K Mixed 20.1 111% 42.1 MB/s	DQ Read 258 DQ Write 192 DQ Mixed 84.9 101% 178 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 78% Great: 92%
Seagate Desktop HDD 6TB (2014)-$220 1,278 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 2.5TB free Firmware: CC45 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 117 100 141434092 (03) Spinup time 87 86 0 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2147 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 78 60 66435708 (09) Power-on hours count 85 85 13741 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1485 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 99 97 115965886491 (BD) vendor-specific 86 86 14 (BE) vendor-specific 65 52 605159459 (BF) G-sense error rate 99 99 2461 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 0 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 98 98 4494 (C2) HDA temperature 35 48 42949672995 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 66 54 141434092 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 65906273170336 (F1) Unknown 100 253 31111783176 (F2) Unknown 100 253 199952736842	82.9% Excellent	Read 152 Write 136 Mixed 113 100% 134 MB/s	4K Read 1.17 4K Write 2.04 4K Mixed 0.32 122% 1.18 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 82.9% Great: 118%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$52 67,711 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 2TB free Firmware: CC54 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (70^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 119 99 219420920 (03) Spinup time 93 91 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 947 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 70 60 12339460 (09) Power-on hours count 95 95 5252 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 739 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 72 58 470876188 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 8 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 80 80 40694 (C2) HDA temperature 28 42 60129542172 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 71554155153671 (F1) Unknown 100 253 14054120854 (F2) Unknown 100 253 541370868641	85.3% Excellent	Read 160 Write 138 Mixed 129 107% 142 MB/s	4K Read 0.75 4K Write 1.51 4K Mixed 0.15 76% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 85.3% Great: 96%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 2400 C15 2x8GB 4,772 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	88.3% Excellent	MC Read 34 MC Write 32.8 MC Mixed 29.7 92% 32.2 GB/s	SC Read 21.4 SC Write 31.7 SC Mixed 25.5 75% 26.2 GB/s	Latency 89.6 45% 89.6 ns
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 88.3% Great: 91%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME X370-PRO Builds (Compare 2,528 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 74%

Battleship

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 72%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	417x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	326x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	204x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	215x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	194x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	189x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	94x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	89x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	75x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	160x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	122x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	57x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $847

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)