MSI H110M ECO (MS-7994)

Performance Results


Gaming 26% Raft	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 20% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	31.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (56%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	MSI MS-7994
Motherboard	MSI H110M ECO (MS-7994) (all builds)
Memory	4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20161216
Uptime	1.3 Days
Run Date	Apr 24 '18 at 17:07
Run Duration	143 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	56%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium G4560-$31 70,054 User benchmarks, average bench 57% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	64.9% Good	Memory 88.8 1-Core 99.9 2-Core 181 73% 123 Pts	4-Core 240 8-Core 242 32% 241 Pts	64-Core 249 15% 249 Pts
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 64.9% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Gigabyte(1458 3732) CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	31.6% Below average	Lighting 39.6 Reflection 31 Parallax 37.5 32% 36 fps	MRender 38.5 Gravity 37.3 Splatting 35.7 30% 37.2 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 31.6% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 120GB-$109 51,792 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 41GB free (System drive) Firmware: DXT08B0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 11252 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 2890 (B1) Unknown 79 79 250 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 69 58 31 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 99 99 1 (EB) Unknown 99 99 464 (F1) Unknown 99 99 41281462356		Read 481 Write 106 Mixed 80.9 48% 223 MB/s
Poor: 46% Great: 73%
Samsung PM851 2.5 7mm 128GB 3,901 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 39GB free Firmware: EXT08D0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 517 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (B0) Unknown 100 100 0 (B1) Unknown 98 98 23 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B4) Unknown 100 100 2203 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (F1) Unknown 99 99 3505284956 (F2) Unknown 99 99 14811215357	52.3% Above average	Read 494 Write 60 Mixed 110 47% 221 MB/s	4K Read 28 4K Write 65.4 4K Mixed 12.2 93% 35.2 MB/s	DQ Read 27.2 DQ Write 75.3 DQ Mixed 33 30% 45.2 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 52.3% Great: 76%
Seagate Momentus Thin 7200 2.5" 320GB-$29 12,279 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 94GB free Firmware: 0007DEM1 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 117 99 166621320 (03) Spinup time 99 98 0 (04) Start/Stop count 95 95 5998 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 75 60 39311557 (09) Power-on hours count 87 87 11460 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2475 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 73 50 538378267 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 2 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 28 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 22 22 157146 (C2) HDA temperature 27 50 55834574875 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 53 40 166621320 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 40888088661896 (F1) Unknown 100 253 919130588 (F2) Unknown 100 253 3820415442 (FA) Read error retry rate 100 1 5861 (FB) Unknown 100 1 704 (FC) Unknown 100 1 196 (FE) Unknown 1 1 2	45.1% Average	Read 75.1 Write 82 Mixed 62.2 55% 73.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.62 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.2 65% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 45.1% Great: 64%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT4G4DFS8213.C8FADP 2x4GB 647 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (26^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	63.8% Good	MC Read 23.2 MC Write 25 MC Mixed 20.7 66% 23 GB/s	SC Read 14.5 SC Write 17.8 SC Mixed 16.5 46% 16.3 GB/s	Latency 68.8 58% 68.8 ns
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 63.8% Great: 80%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H110M ECO (MS-7994) Builds (Compare 869 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 24%

Surfboard

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 20%

Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI H110M ECO (MS-7994)

CPU
Core i5-7400Intel $110Bench 64%, 234,266 samples	181x
Core i5-7500Intel $89Bench 67%, 149,467 samples	91x
Core i3-7100Intel $70Bench 57%, 79,299 samples	72x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	130x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	94x
GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples	58x

SSD
A400 120GBKingston $32Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	38x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	34x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	31x

RAM
Value DDR4 2133 C15 2x8GBG.SKILLBench 68%, 7,794 samples	20x
CT8G4DFS824A.C8FDD1 1x8GBCrucialBench 40%, 5,207 samples	18x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	15x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 81% - Excellent

Total price: $201

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $46

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16