Hansung U57

Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 42% Speed boat	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	0.73% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	68.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 52% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	Hansung U57 (all builds)
Motherboard	Notebook N250BU
Memory	5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170803
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 24 '18 at 10:16
Run Duration	138 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	18%
CPU Throttled	52%

PC Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium 4415U 6,525 User benchmarks, average bench 49% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 1.2 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	42% Average	Memory 66.3 1-Core 44.7 2-Core 74.4 41% 61.8 Pts	4-Core 105 8-Core 106 14% 105 Pts	64-Core 104 6% 104 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 42% Great: 59%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 610 9,913 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Clevo(1558 2410) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 22.20.16.4836 Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	0.73% Terrible	Lighting 0.7 Reflection 1.12 Parallax 0.72 1% 0.84 fps	MRender 1.33 Gravity 0.6 Splatting 1.7 1% 1.21 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 0.73% Great: 3%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingdian S290 120GB 31 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 74GB free (System drive) Firmware: Q0919A0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (79^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 4 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 350 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 280 (A0) Unknown 100 100 11 (A1) Unknown 100 100 92 (A3) Unknown 100 100 38 (A4) Unknown 100 100 13839 (A5) Unknown 100 100 39 (A6) Unknown 100 100 3 (A7) Unknown 100 100 19 (A8) Unknown 100 100 7000 (A9) Unknown 100 100 100 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (B0) Unknown 100 100 0 (B1) Unknown 100 100 0 (B2) Unknown 100 100 4 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 15 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 49 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 58541 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 11 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 4 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 11 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E8) Unknown 100 100 92 (F1) Unknown 100 100 18051 (F2) Unknown 100 100 20517 (F5) Unknown 100 100 20877	68.6% Good	Read 501 Write 415 Mixed 461 102% 459 MB/s	4K Read 23.1 4K Write 47.1 4K Mixed 4.54 66% 24.9 MB/s	DQ Read 126 DQ Write 100 DQ Mixed 6.18 34% 77.6 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 68.6% Great: 76%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CRC 2x4GB 36,396 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (14^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	47.2% Average	MC Read 14 MC Write 21.2 MC Mixed 17 50% 17.4 GB/s	SC Read 8.1 SC Write 13.6 SC Mixed 11.7 32% 11.1 GB/s	Latency 110 36% 110 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 47.2% Great: 69%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $274	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $183	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16