Asrock X399 Taichi

Performance Results


Gaming 23% Surfboard	Desktop 83% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 27% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	16.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	231% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asrock X399 Taichi (all builds)
Memory	41 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20171121
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Apr 24 '18 at 02:53
Run Duration	356 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen TR 1950X-$225 23,641 User benchmarks, average bench 77% SP3r2, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	79% Very good	Memory 65.9 1-Core 123 2-Core 246 78% 145 Pts	4-Core 492 8-Core 980 87% 736 Pts	64-Core 2,653 164% 2,653 Pts
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 79% Great: 85%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030 185,384 User benchmarks, average bench 14% EVGA(3842 6332) 2GB CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 390.77 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	16.1% Very poor	Lighting 20.2 Reflection 15.9 Parallax 18.9 16% 18.3 fps	MRender 16 Gravity 19.1 Splatting 20.8 16% 18.6 fps
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 16.1% Great: 15%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$249 18,356 User benchmarks, average bench 279% 740GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B6QCXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	231% Outstanding	Read 1,984 Write 1,844 Mixed 1,703 411% 1,844 MB/s	4K Read 36.6 4K Write 71.1 4K Mixed 23.3 123% 43.7 MB/s	DQ Read 33.2 DQ Write 116 DQ Mixed 64.6 52% 71.3 MB/s
Poor: 168% ↑ This bench: 231% Great: 363%
Seagate BUP BK 4TB 13,353 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 3TB free Firmware: 0304 Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	20.1% Poor	Read 34 Write 34.3 Mixed 31.3 25% 33.2 MB/s	4K Read 1.7 4K Write 4.65 4K Mixed 0.01 158% 2.12 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 20.1% Great: 65%
Seagate BUP BK 4TB 13,353 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 3TB free Firmware: 0304 Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	11% Very poor	Read 4.45 Write 33 Mixed 26.5 16% 21.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.11 4K Write 2.99 4K Mixed 0.005 60% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 11% Great: 65%
Hitachi HUH721010ALE604 10TB 488 User benchmarks, average bench 111% 2.5TB free Firmware: LHAZW2J2 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 134 134 96 (03) Spinup time 150 150 34388443572 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 886 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 128 128 18 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 887 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 7 (16) Unknown 100 100 100 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 1067 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 1067 (C2) HDA temperature 200 200 146030002206 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	95.3% Outstanding	Read 168 Write 164 Mixed 148 120% 160 MB/s	4K Read 0.71 4K Write 4.66 4K Mixed 0.81 206% 2.06 MB/s
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 95.3% Great: 137%
Seagate Video SV35.6 Series 3TB-$79 6,381 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 2.5TB free Firmware: CV23 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (80^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 114 99 67314368 (03) Spinup time 94 90 0 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1654 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 84 60 244172322 (09) Power-on hours count 67 67 29209 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 78 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 1 1 443 (BE) vendor-specific 70 62 504430622 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 27 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 1654 (C2) HDA temperature 30 40 55834574878 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	106% Outstanding	Read 187 Write 183 Mixed 181 138% 184 MB/s	4K Read 0.89 4K Write 1.25 4K Mixed 0.21 84% 0.78 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 106% Great: 114%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 18ASF2G72AZ-2G3B1 8x16GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 128% 8 of 8 slots used 128GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	141% Outstanding	MC Read 57.8 MC Write 57.1 MC Mixed 53.4 160% 56.1 GB/s	SC Read 15.8 SC Write 35 SC Mixed 23.3 71% 24.7 GB/s	Latency 111 36% 111 ns
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 141% Great: 144%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X399 Taichi Builds (Compare 561 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 99%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 120%

UFO

Motherboard: Asrock X399 Taichi

CPU
Ryzen TR 1950XAMD $225Bench 77%, 23,641 samples	155x
Ryzen TR 1920XAMD $800Bench 78%, 10,440 samples	114x
Ryzen TR 2950XAMD $798Bench 81%, 10,169 samples	103x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	47x
RTX 3090Nvidia $1,306Bench 210%, 158,856 samples	36x
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	27x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	38x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	28x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	19x

RAM
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	13x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 89%, 92,468 samples	12x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 4x16GBG.SKILL $143Bench 95%, 14,506 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 80% - Excellent

Total price: $918

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16