Asus K30AD_M31AD_M51AD

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	32.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Asus K30AD_M31AD_M51AD (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK K30AD_M31AD_M51AD_M32AD
Memory	9 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140402
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 23 '18 at 21:57
Run Duration	100 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	6%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4790S-$60 13,224 User benchmarks, average bench 72% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	80.7% Excellent	Memory 91.5 1-Core 112 2-Core 213 80% 139 Pts	4-Core 377 8-Core 568 59% 472 Pts	64-Core 568 35% 568 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 80.7% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% MSI(1462 8C96) CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 381.65 Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	32.6% Below average	Lighting 40.8 Reflection 32.5 Parallax 38.7 33% 37.3 fps	MRender 38.7 Gravity 39 Splatting 37.7 31% 38.5 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 32.6% Great: 33%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$50 344,862 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 1TB free (System drive) Firmware: MX4OABS0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 139 139 70 (03) Spinup time 129 129 21494038822 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 1849 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 128 128 31 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 14209 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1847 (C0) Power-off retract count 99 99 1849 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 99 99 1849 (C2) HDA temperature 181 181 236223987745 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0
Poor: 49% Great: 108%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B1G73DB0-CK0 M378B5173DB0-CK0 12GB 3,029 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 4096 MB Performing below potential (20^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	34.9% Below average	MC Read 12.2 MC Write 11.5 MC Mixed 9.3 32% 11 GB/s	SC Read 11.3 SC Write 12.7 SC Mixed 10.8 33% 11.6 GB/s	Latency 64.9 62% 64.9 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 34.9% Great: 57%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical K30AD_M31AD_M51AD Builds (Compare 2,169 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 26%

Raft

Desktop 78%

Battleship

Workstation 22%

Surfboard

System: Asus K30AD_M31AD_M51AD

CPU
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	413x
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples	397x
Core i7-4790SIntel $60Bench 72%, 13,224 samples	350x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	162x
GTX 750Nvidia $120Bench 15%, 66,662 samples	156x
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	142x

SSD
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	48x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	44x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	37x

RAM
M378B1G73DB0-CK0 2x8GBSamsungBench 55%, 9,947 samples	217x
M378B1G73DB0-CK0 M378B5173DB0-CK0 12GBSamsungBench 43%, 3,029 samples	215x
M378B1G73DB0-CK0 1x8GBSamsungBench 30%, 12,268 samples	112x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 71% - Very good

Total price: $324

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16