Samsung RC420/RC520/RC720

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive62.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemSamsung RC420/RC520/RC720  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG RC420/RC520/RC720
Memory4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120906
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateApr 23 '18 at 17:48
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2410M-$160
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
56% Above average
Memory 81.3
1-Core 74.3
2-Core 122
58% 92.6 Pts
4-Core 180
8-Core 182
24% 181 Pts
64-Core 151
9% 151 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 56%
Great: 58%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX100 256GB-$116
159GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
62.9% Good
Read 495
Write 320
Mixed 388
89% 401 MB/s
4K Read 15.7
4K Write 66.2
4K Mixed 11.8
74% 31.2 MB/s
DQ Read 18.4
DQ Write 74.6
DQ Mixed 12.6
20% 35.2 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 62.9%
Great: 97%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 64GB-$12
45GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
7.02% Terrible
Read 25.5
Write 9.65
Mixed 13.4
18% 16.2 MB/s
4K Read 5.03
4K Write 0.01
4K Mixed 0.01
19% 1.68 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 7.02%
Great: 30%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMSO4GX3M1A1333C9 Samsung M471B5273CH0-CH9 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
49.1% Average
MC Read 17.7
MC Write 17.9
MC Mixed 15.9
49% 17.2 GB/s
SC Read 12.8
SC Write 13.6
SC Mixed 15
40% 13.8 GB/s
Latency 78.1
51% 78.1 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 49.1%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical RC420/RC520/RC720 Builds (Compare 93 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung RC420/RC520/RC720

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $160
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback