Asrock 970 Extreme4

Performance Results


Gaming 23% Surfboard	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 18% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	28.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	58.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asrock 970 Extreme4 (all builds)
Memory	11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150805
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Apr 22 '18 at 22:37
Run Duration	150 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-6300-$47 261,607 User benchmarks, average bench 55% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	67.5% Good	Memory 92.8 1-Core 66 2-Core 125 60% 94.7 Pts	4-Core 236 8-Core 305 34% 270 Pts	64-Core 296 18% 296 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 67.5% Great: 62%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 270X-$199 77,943 User benchmarks, average bench 27% Sapphire(174B E271) CLim: 1070 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 18.2.1 Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	28.4% Poor	Lighting 35.9 Reflection 32.5 Parallax 43.8 29% 37.4 fps	MRender 28.7 Gravity 30.2 Splatting 37.1 27% 32 fps
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 28.4% Great: 29%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Seagate 600 120GB-$106 655 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 30GB free (System drive) Firmware: C675 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 166 166 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 92 92 7461 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 2214 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 33 0 60133081121 (C9) Soft read error rate 100 100 0 (CC) Soft ECC correction 100 100 0 (E7) Temperature 92 92 9 (EA) Unknown 100 100 55065 (F1) Unknown 100 100 9306 (F2) Unknown 100 100 17355 (FA) Read error retry rate 100 100 300572	58.5% Above average	Read 383 Write 284 Mixed 243 67% 303 MB/s	4K Read 22.5 4K Write 48.5 4K Mixed 15.3 79% 28.8 MB/s	DQ Read 27.9 DQ Write 79.4 DQ Mixed 17.1 24% 41.5 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 58.5% Great: 90%
Seagate ST3320820AS 320GB-$55 14,577 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 297GB free Firmware: 3.AAD Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 99 85 163245077 (03) Spinup time 97 95 0 (04) Start/Stop count 89 89 11282 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 57 57 6374494304221 (09) Power-on hours count 74 74 23452 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 94 94 6755 (BB) vendor-specific 97 97 3 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 62 47 640024614 (C2) HDA temperature 38 53 68719476774 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 49 46 72039633 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 253 0	42.7% Average	Read 74.7 Write 73.8 Mixed 28.3 43% 58.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.65 4K Write 1.35 4K Mixed 0.41 97% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 42.7% Great: 44%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$34 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 194GB free Firmware: CC46 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (40^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 119 99 209173600 (03) Spinup time 97 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1874 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 68 60 12909161481 (09) Power-on hours count 94 94 5276 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1357 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 99 1 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 65 52 622854179 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 20 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 76 76 48122 (C2) HDA temperature 35 48 55834574883 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 52798032972917 (F1) Unknown 100 253 21894444285 (F2) Unknown 100 253 32776732542	87.2% Excellent	Read 157 Write 147 Mixed 30.9 81% 112 MB/s	4K Read 0.62 4K Write 1.85 4K Mixed 0.17 79% 0.88 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 87.2% Great: 112%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C7 4x4GB 838 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz Performing below potential (13^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	45% Average	MC Read 18.5 MC Write 13.2 MC Mixed 15.7 45% 15.8 GB/s	SC Read 10.1 SC Write 8.1 SC Mixed 11.1 28% 9.77 GB/s	Latency 62.6 64% 62.6 ns
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 45% Great: 85%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 970 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 407 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 22%

Surfboard

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970 Extreme4 - $107

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	127x
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	73x
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	59x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	31x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	24x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	21x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	15x
850 Evo 120GBSamsung $80Bench 96%, 69,224 samples	13x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	13x

RAM
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	12x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 28,461 samples	9x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	9x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $396

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16