Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	11.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	41.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-950-$100 36,389 User benchmarks, average bench 66% Socket 1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	75.6% Very good	Memory 98 1-Core 83.7 2-Core 167 71% 116 Pts	4-Core 290 8-Core 421 44% 356 Pts	64-Core 421 26% 421 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 75.6% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 6790 4,043 User benchmarks, average bench 11% Sapphire(174B 174B) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	11.7% Very poor	Lighting 15.1 Reflection 13.3 Parallax 13.2 12% 13.9 fps	MRender 11.2 Gravity 10.6 Splatting 15.3 10% 12.4 fps
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 11.7% Great: 12%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Corsair Force GT 120GB-$155 13,464 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 21GB free (System drive) Firmware: 5.07 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	41.5% Average	Read 263 Write 141 Mixed 175 43% 193 MB/s	4K Read 23.3 4K Write 41.1 4K Mixed 11.5 72% 25.3 MB/s	DQ Read 25.1 DQ Write 45.5 DQ Mixed 9.68 15% 26.8 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 41.5% Great: 83%
WD WD10EAVS-00D7B1 1TB 26,179 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 20GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	32.3% Below average	Read 58.8 Write 53.3 Mixed 75.8 48% 62.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.38 4K Write 1.89 4K Mixed 0.29 83% 0.85 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 32.3% Great: 51%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x4GB 154,807 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 1 of 6 slots used 4GB DIMM Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	30.3% Below average	MC Read 11.7 MC Write 6.4 MC Mixed 6.4 23% 8.17 GB/s	SC Read 11.2 SC Write 12.6 SC Mixed 9.9 32% 11.2 GB/s	Latency 46.2 86% 46.2 ns
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 30.3% Great: 52%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 35%

Jet ski

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 28%

Raft

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	21x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $38Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	15x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	14x

Value: 58% - Above average

Total price: $394

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16