Lenovo 4389W7A

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 10%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 8.73%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics2.82% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (87%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemLenovo 4389W7A  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 4389W7A
Memory8.6 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100917
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 22 '18 at 14:34
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 87%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 Q 820-$119
None, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.75 GHz
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
8.73% Terrible
Memory 13.4
1-Core 6.9
2-Core 13.3
8% 11.2 Pts
4-Core 22.7
8-Core 35.1
4% 28.9 Pts
64-Core 32.7
2% 32.7 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 8.73%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro FX 880M
Legend(17AA 2145) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 341.44
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
2.82% Terrible
Lighting 3.23
Reflection 5.81
Parallax 1.25
3% 3.43 fps
MRender 6.19
Gravity 2.1
Splatting 3.65
3% 3.98 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.82%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST9320423AS 320GB-$40
154GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0003 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
42.7% Average
Read 74.7
Write 74.2
Mixed 72.2
56% 73.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.26
4K Write 0.66
4K Mixed 0.13
38% 0.35 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 42.7%
Great: 51%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT51264BF160B.C16F 859B CT51264BF160B.C16F 80CE M471B5673FH0-CF8 80CE M471B5673FH0-CF8 12GB
1600, 1600, 1066, 1066 MHz
4096, 4096, 2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
15.7% Very poor
MC Read 6.4
MC Write 5.3
MC Mixed 7
18% 6.23 GB/s
SC Read 1.5
SC Write 2
SC Mixed 1.7
5% 1.73 GB/s
Latency 374
11% 374 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback