Toshiba SATELLITE L750

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 49% Yacht	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	2.52% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	61.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (43%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 81% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Toshiba SATELLITE L750 (all builds)
Motherboard	Intel Base Board Product Name
Memory	4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120210
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 22 '18 at 06:52
Run Duration	92 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	43%
CPU Throttled	81%

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2670QM-$200 51,169 User benchmarks, average bench 56% CPU1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	52% Above average	Memory 79.2 1-Core 41.8 2-Core 86.3 46% 69.1 Pts	4-Core 137 8-Core 218 22% 177 Pts	64-Core 238 15% 238 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 52% Great: 67%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 525M 9,032 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Toshiba(1179 FC50) 1GB CLim: 475 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 376.54 Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	2.52% Terrible	Lighting 3.13 Reflection 3.42 Parallax 2.56 3% 3.04 fps	MRender 4.33 Gravity 3 Splatting 2.09 2% 3.14 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.52% Great: 3%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150 68,337 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 104GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0BB0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 9076 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 3161 (B1) Unknown 98 98 17 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 57 49 43 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 151 (F1) Unknown 99 99 21536039167	61.6% Good	Read 483 Write 336 Mixed 350 86% 390 MB/s	4K Read 22.3 4K Write 33.5 4K Mixed 13.4 69% 23.1 MB/s	DQ Read 25.5 DQ Write 40.4 DQ Mixed 13.5 16% 26.5 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 61.6% Great: 126%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5428-040.A01LF 2x4GB 640 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	45.4% Average	MC Read 16.7 MC Write 17.4 MC Mixed 15.7 47% 16.6 GB/s	SC Read 9.1 SC Write 8.9 SC Mixed 9.6 26% 9.2 GB/s	Latency 82 49% 82 ns
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 45.4% Great: 51%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical SATELLITE L750 Builds (Compare 388 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 52%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Toshiba SATELLITE L750

CPU
Core i7-2670QMIntel $200Bench 56%, 51,169 samples	145x
Core i5-2430MIntel $53Bench 50%, 41,461 samples	75x
Core i5-2450MIntel $225Bench 49%, 51,836 samples	35x

GPU
GeForce GT 525MNvidiaBench 2%, 9,032 samples	226x
GeForce GT 520MNvidiaBench 2%, 5,654 samples	66x
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	43x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	17x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	9x
870 EVO 500GBSamsung $60Bench 104%, 60,851 samples	7x

RAM
M471B5273CH0-CH9 1x4GBSamsungBench 24%, 13,596 samples	73x
M471B5273CH0-CH9 2x4GBSamsungBench 41%, 10,285 samples	24x
M471B5273DH0-CH9 1x4GBSamsungBench 25%, 18,713 samples	19x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 57% - Above average

Total price: $228

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $46

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16