Medion Erazer X5367 F/C030

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive	91% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Medion Erazer X5367 F/C030 (all builds)
Motherboard	MEDION B150H4-EM
Memory	13.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20151124
Uptime	3.2 Days
Run Date	Apr 21 '18 at 21:11
Run Duration	114 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700-$180 282,363 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	80.2% Excellent	Memory 87.7 1-Core 113 2-Core 219 80% 140 Pts	4-Core 391 8-Core 642 63% 517 Pts	64-Core 638 40% 638 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 80.2% Great: 80%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 520 Series 240GB-$139 12,595 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 33GB free Firmware: 400i Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (70^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 0 0 101627517063506 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1129 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 100 100 94 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 94 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 117826 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 65535 (E3) Torque amplification count 100 100 67 (E4) Power-off retract count 100 100 65535 (E8) Unknown 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 100 100 0 (F1) Unknown 100 100 117826 (F2) Unknown 100 100 248966 (F9) Unknown 100 100 5028	85.9% Excellent	Read 487 Write 264 Mixed 324 79% 358 MB/s	4K Read 35.3 4K Write 93.5 4K Mixed 23.3 133% 50.7 MB/s	DQ Read 254 DQ Write 258 DQ Mixed 78.4 108% 197 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 85.9% Great: 95%
Samsung MZNLN256HCHP-00000 256GB 3,145 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 22GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT2100Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 6031 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 620 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 76 76 508 (AE) Unknown 99 99 61 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (B4) Unknown 100 100 777 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 55 49 45 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 74 74 12515802 (F1) Unknown 99 99 68412 (F2) Unknown 99 99 8665 (F9) Unknown 99 99 130240	91% Outstanding	Read 495 Write 256 Mixed 344 80% 365 MB/s	4K Read 32 4K Write 94.5 4K Mixed 32.4 140% 53 MB/s	DQ Read 331 DQ Write 271 DQ Mixed 100 130% 234 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 91% Great: 100%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 344GB free Firmware: CC26 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 114 99 69071416 (03) Spinup time 98 96 0 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1140 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 75 60 37417175 (09) Power-on hours count 94 94 6026 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 618 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 65 58 605356067 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 0 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 78 78 45013 (C2) HDA temperature 35 42 34359738403 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -65751654330380 (F1) Unknown 100 253 19676833758 (F2) Unknown 100 253 68389129282	80.4% Excellent	Read 151 Write 129 Mixed 133 104% 138 MB/s	4K Read 0.56 4K Write 1.45 4K Mixed 0.21 74% 0.74 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 80.4% Great: 114%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
HyperX Fury DDR4 2400 C15 2x8GB-$299 20,912 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (23^rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	73.4% Very good	MC Read 26.9 MC Write 28.1 MC Mixed 23.7 75% 26.2 GB/s	SC Read 15.6 SC Write 25.8 SC Mixed 21.6 60% 21 GB/s	Latency 69.8 57% 69.8 ns
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 73.4% Great: 91%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Erazer X5367 F/C030 Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 41%

Speed boat

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 35%

Jet ski

System: Medion Erazer X5367 F/C030

CPU
Core i7-6700Intel $180Bench 72%, 282,363 samples	7x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	4x
GTX 1070-TiNvidia $299Bench 94%, 412,133 samples	1x
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	1x

SSD
MZNLN256HCHP-00000 256GBSamsungBench 79%, 3,145 samples	3x
MZNTY256HDHP-00000 256GBSamsungBench 87%, 2,168 samples	2x
850 Pro 512GBSamsung $210Bench 102%, 68,849 samples	1x

RAM
Fury DDR4 2400 C15 2x8GBHyperX $299Bench 79%, 20,912 samples	7x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 48% - Average

Total price: $679

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16