Dell Precision T3600

Performance Results


Gaming 10% Tree trunk	Desktop 67% Battle cruiser	Workstation 10% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	1.16% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	96.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Dell Precision T3600
Motherboard	Dell Precision T3600 (all builds)
Memory	28.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20170508
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 21 '18 at 18:39
Run Duration	352 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	16%

PC Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-1620 0-$345 17,464 User benchmarks, average bench 70% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	71.5% Very good	Memory 84.6 1-Core 98.5 2-Core 197 73% 127 Pts	4-Core 316 8-Core 497 50% 406 Pts	64-Core 498 31% 498 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 71.5% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia NVS 300 2,463 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Nvidia(10DE 0862) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 331.82 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.16% Terrible	Lighting 1.2 Reflection 2.38 Parallax 0.62 1% 1.4 fps	MRender 3.14 Gravity 0.77 Splatting 1.78 2% 1.9 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.16% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial_CT525MX3 525GB 577 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 399GB free (System drive) Firmware: R040 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 3603 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1109 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 99 99 21 (AE) Unknown 100 100 140 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 70 55 193274839070 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 1 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 99 99 1 (CE) Flying height 100 100 0 (F6) Unknown 100 100 9225593070 (F7) Unknown 100 100 302141736 (F8) Unknown 100 100 165609511 (B4) Unknown 0 0 1951 (D2) Unknown 100 100 0	96.4% Outstanding	Read 476 Write 465 Mixed 455 104% 466 MB/s	4K Read 26.5 4K Write 86.2 4K Mixed 30.6 125% 47.7 MB/s	DQ Read 277 DQ Write 219 DQ Mixed 64.2 98% 187 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 96.4% Great: 98%
Crucial MX100 256GB-$116 55,768 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 106GB free Firmware: MU01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 1 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 13187 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 5208 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 98 98 64 (AE) Unknown 100 100 985 (B4) Unknown 0 0 2159 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 69 56 188979937311 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 98 98 2 (CE) Flying height 100 100 0 (D2) Unknown 100 100 0 (F6) Unknown 100 100 12289204417 (F7) Unknown 100 100 387946187 (F8) Unknown 100 100 978699390	55.6% Above average	Read 270 Write 254 Mixed 261 58% 262 MB/s	4K Read 20.1 4K Write 33.9 4K Mixed 27 83% 27 MB/s	DQ Read 101 DQ Write 37.7 DQ Mixed 47.7 41% 62.1 MB/s
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 55.6% Great: 97%
Hitachi HDS722020ALA330 2TB-$71 17,356 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 1.5TB free Firmware: JKAOA3EA Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (79^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 132 132 104 (03) Spinup time 115 115 51580830326 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 3350 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 119 119 36 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 12589 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1418 (C0) Power-off retract count 98 98 3535 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 98 98 3536 (C2) HDA temperature 214 214 227634708508 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 5017	63.2% Good	Read 105 Write 115 Mixed 60 69% 93.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.74 4K Write 1.41 4K Mixed 0.39 100% 0.85 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 63.2% Great: 69%
WDC WD40 EZRZ-00GXCB0 4TB 154 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 2.5TB free, PID 0567 Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	63% Good	Read 143 Write 159 Mixed 115 178% 139 MB/s	4K Read 0.91 4K Write 2.43 4K Mixed 0.25 94% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 63% Great: 68%
WDC WD20 EZRX-00D8PB0 2TB 77 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 1.5TB free, PID 0567 Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	56.6% Above average	Read 131 Write 136 Mixed 113 162% 127 MB/s	4K Read 0.91 4K Write 2.55 4K Mixed 0.29 100% 1.25 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 56.6% Great: 59%
ST1000DM 003-1CH162 1TB 34 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 775GB free, PID 0567 Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	69.8% Good	Read 175 Write 183 Mixed 132 208% 163 MB/s	4K Read 0.89 4K Write 1.38 4K Mixed 0.35 62% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 69.8% Great: 70%
WDC WD20 EZRX-00DC0B0 2TB 29 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 585GB free, PID 0567 Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	44% Average	Read 94.9 Write 101 Mixed 56.5 106% 84.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.89 4K Write 2.58 4K Mixed 0.25 100% 1.24 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 44% Great: 57%
Innostor Innostor 32GB 1,196 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 29GB free, PID 0917 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	7.68% Terrible	Read 33 Write 5.92 Mixed 6.23 14% 15.1 MB/s	4K Read 4.66 4K Write 0.16 4K Mixed 0.19 29% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 7.68% Great: 29%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Toshiba-0098 KHX1600C10D3/8GX KHX1600C10D3/8GX 9905403-558.A00LF KHX1600C10D3/8GX 32GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	82.9% Excellent	MC Read 31.6 MC Write 34 MC Mixed 30.3 91% 32 GB/s	SC Read 15.6 SC Write 14.1 SC Mixed 12.8 40% 14.2 GB/s	Latency 72.5 55% 72.5 ns
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 82.9% Great: 83%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Precision T3600 Builds (Compare 2,847 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 13%

Tree trunk

Desktop 67%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 12%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Dell Precision T3600

CPU
Xeon E5-1620 0Intel $345Bench 70%, 17,464 samples	1,061x
Xeon E5-1650 0Intel $230Bench 73%, 10,189 samples	444x
Xeon E5-1603 0IntelBench 60%, 3,589 samples	237x

GPU
Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples	162x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	137x
Quadro 4000NvidiaBench 7%, 8,609 samples	117x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	83x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	62x
870 EVO 1TBSamsung $89Bench 112%, 129,044 samples	48x

RAM
M393B5273DH0-CK0 4x4GBSamsung-00CEBench 85%, 1,049 samples	147x
HMT351R7CFR8C-PB 4x4GBHynix-00ADBench 83%, 808 samples	130x
M393B1K70DH0-CK0 4x8GBSamsung-00CEBench 79%, 545 samples	73x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $373

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16