PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 15.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
System | HP Compaq dx2400 Microtower PC (all builds) |
Motherboard | PEGATRON 2A73h |
Memory | 3.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz |
Display | 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20081216 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | Apr 21 '18 at 17:10 |
Run Duration | 175 Seconds |
Run User | TUR-User |
Background CPU | 16% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
44.1%
Average
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GT 1030
Gigabyte(1458 375C) 2GB
CLim: 2050 MHz, MLim: 1553 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35
|
15.9%
Very poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
23%
Poor
|
||||
Seagate Momentus Thin 5400.9 2.5" 500GB-$21
67GB free
Firmware: 1003YAM1 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
|
36.1%
Below average
|
|||
51.8%
Above average
|
||||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR2
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
17.4%
Very poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples | 5x |
Pentium Dual E2180Intel $130Bench 33%, 7,312 samples | 4x |
Core2 Duo E8400Intel $89Bench 40%, 68,540 samples | 4x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples | 5x |
GeForce GT 610NvidiaBench 2%, 62,458 samples | 4x |
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 3x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 47% - Average | Total price: $125 |