Asus X99-DELUXE

Performance Results


Gaming 38% Jet ski	Desktop 92% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 34% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	32.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	87.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus X99-DELUXE (all builds)
Memory	9.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20141016
Uptime	1.4 Days
Run Date	Mar 04 '16 at 15:08
Run Duration	318 Seconds
Run User	ISR-User
Background CPU	31%

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-5930K-$70 34,039 User benchmarks, average bench 80% SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	91.2% Outstanding	Memory 93.1 1-Core 119 2-Core 246 86% 153 Pts	4-Core 480 8-Core 735 75% 608 Pts	64-Core 902 56% 902 Pts
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 91.2% Great: 91%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K5200 1,717 User benchmarks, average bench 31% Nvidia(10DE 1095) ≥ 4GB Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 9.18.13.4725 Performing below potential (77^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	32.2% Below average	Lighting 40.4 Reflection 41 Parallax 52.6 33% 44.7 fps	MRender 52.9 Gravity 35.1 Splatting 29.2 31% 39.1 fps
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 32.2% Great: 34%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80 69,224 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 33GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 5901 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 351 (B1) Unknown 95 95 87 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 99 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 66 54 34 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 22 (F1) Unknown 99 99 14503244931	87.2% Excellent	Read 514 Write 412 Mixed 412 99% 446 MB/s	4K Read 42.2 4K Write 76.1 4K Mixed 22.5 133% 46.9 MB/s	DQ Read 41.6 DQ Write 76.1 DQ Mixed 22.2 27% 46.7 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 87.2% Great: 115%
WD WD3200AAVS-00ZTB0 320GB 568 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 298GB free Firmware: 01.01B01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (84^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 167 160 4616 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3386 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 85 85 11143 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 250 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 55 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 196 196 14068 (C2) HDA temperature 123 84 24 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	38.2% Below average	Read 70.1 Write 62.7 Mixed 57.1 48% 63.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.54 4K Write 2.06 4K Mixed 0.25 88% 0.95 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 38.2% Great: 45%
WD Green 500GB (2009)-$23 63,281 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 186GB free Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 149 146 3516 (04) Start/Stop count 95 95 5391 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 69 69 22949 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2252 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 313 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 139 139 185951 (C2) HDA temperature 118 98 25 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	41.3% Average	Read 71 Write 72.6 Mixed 71.1 54% 71.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.52 4K Write 2.11 4K Mixed 0.25 88% 0.96 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 41.3% Great: 54%
WD Blue 1TB (2010)-$39 55,121 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 141GB free Firmware: 15.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 173 171 4333 (04) Start/Stop count 94 94 6346 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 77 77 16866 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1311 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 175 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 198 198 6170 (C2) HDA temperature 117 98 30 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	44.9% Average	Read 77.1 Write 79.8 Mixed 71.7 57% 76.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 0.39 4K Mixed 0.09 21% 0.19 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 44.9% Great: 74%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$48 240,965 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 140GB free Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 175 174 2225 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2653 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 92 92 5859 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 357 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 27 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 2626 (C2) HDA temperature 114 100 29 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	61.9% Good	Read 96.9 Write 118 Mixed 116 84% 111 MB/s	4K Read 0.48 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.22 86% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 61.9% Great: 108%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$48 240,965 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 20GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 175 174 2250 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1227 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 3085 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 145 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 8 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 1218 (C2) HDA temperature 119 102 24 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	43.8% Average	Read 96.8 Write 55.6 Mixed 66.5 55% 73 MB/s	4K Read 0.91 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.16 72% 0.66 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 43.8% Great: 108%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB 14,232 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 408GB free, PID a202 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	28.7% Poor	Read 77.9 Write 77.7 Mixed 70.8 97% 75.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 0.16 4K Mixed 0.05 7% 0.1 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 28.7% Great: 49%
Seagate Expansion Desk 2TB 7,241 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 142GB free, PID 3312 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	54.6% Above average	Read 132 Write 141 Mixed 127 173% 133 MB/s	4K Read 0.76 4K Write 1.49 4K Mixed 0.22 61% 0.82 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 54.6% Great: 74%
Lexar SD USB_3_0 Read 64GB 84 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 59GB free, PID b050 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	43.3% Average	Read 83.7 Write 79.6 Mixed 81.1 105% 81.5 MB/s	4K Read 9.03 4K Write 3.79 4K Mixed 2.72 255% 5.18 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 43.3% Great: 48%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown DDR4 2800 2OZ 4x4GB 872 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 4 of 8 slots used 16GB DIMM 2133 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	100% Outstanding	MC Read 37.7 MC Write 41 MC Mixed 35.6 109% 38.1 GB/s	SC Read 15.5 SC Write 22.5 SC Mixed 21.5 57% 19.8 GB/s	Latency 61.8 65% 61.8 ns
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 100% Great: 104%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X99-DELUXE Builds (Compare 1,864 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 82%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 82%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 73%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus X99-DELUXE - $170

CPU
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples	835x
Core i7-5930KIntel $70Bench 80%, 34,039 samples	462x
Core i7-5960XIntel $285Bench 80%, 15,468 samples	282x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	148x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	142x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	123x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	77x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	54x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	49x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 4x4GBCorsair $115Bench 88%, 5,380 samples	38x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2800 C16 4x4GBCorsair $210Bench 88%, 3,970 samples	31x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 4x8GBCorsair $92Bench 85%, 8,498 samples	29x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $910

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16