Gigabyte Z370 Aorus Gaming 7

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics26.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte Z370 Aorus Gaming 7  (all builds)
Memory10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170922
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 21 '18 at 01:55
Run Duration173 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$188
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
95.9% Outstanding
Memory 92.1
1-Core 138
2-Core 270
92% 166 Pts
4-Core 535
8-Core 896
87% 716 Pts
64-Core 1139
70% 1139 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 95.9%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-Ti-$362
EVGA(3842 3662) 2GB
CLim: 1241 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing below potential (64th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
26.2% Poor
Lighting 31.2
Reflection 33.1
Parallax 39.3
25% 34.5 fps
MRender 39.9
Gravity 36.8
Splatting 27.7
28% 34.8 fps
Poor: 23%
This bench: 26.2%
Great: 29%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
305GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 80% Great: 134%
Seagate IronWolf 8TB (2016)-$175
5.5TB free
Firmware: SC61 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 31% Great: 106%
Toshiba X300 6TB-$78
2.5TB free
Firmware: FS2A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
92.8% Outstanding
Read 163
Write 159
Mixed 158
121% 160 MB/s
4K Read 4.49
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.34
265% 2.34 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 92.8%
Great: 109%
Hitachi HDS724040ALE640 4TB-$465
991GB free
Firmware: MJAOA580 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
62% Good
Read 111
Write 105
Mixed 104
80% 107 MB/s
4K Read 0.66
4K Write 1.47
4K Mixed 0.23
80% 0.78 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 62%
Great: 91%
WD Black 3TB (2012)-$205
654GB free
Firmware: 01.01L01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
70.1% Very good
Read 119
Write 126
Mixed 130
94% 125 MB/s
4K Read 0.47
4K Write 2.02
4K Mixed 0.52
114% 1 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 70.1%
Great: 92%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$39
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
71.1% Very good
MC Read 27.2
MC Write 27.2
MC Mixed 19.8
71% 24.7 GB/s
SC Read 17.4
SC Write 27.6
SC Mixed 21.9
64% 22.3 GB/s
Latency 63.8
63% 63.8 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 71.1%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z370 AORUS Gaming 7 Builds (Compare 3,950 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 112%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z370 Aorus Gaming 7 - $221

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Excellent Total price: $1,065
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback