| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 37.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
| Motherboard | Asus P6X58D-E (all builds) |
| Memory | 14.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz |
| Display | 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20101116 |
| Uptime | 61.3 Days |
| Run Date | Apr 20 '18 at 13:07 |
| Run Duration | 141 Seconds |
| Run User | THA-User |
| Background CPU | 0% |
PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
68.5%
Good
|
64% 104 Pts
|
38% 296 Pts
|
22% 359 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD R9 390X-$340
Asus(1043 04DF) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1070 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 18.3.4
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
37.7%
Below average
|
38% 47.7 fps
|
38% 45.1 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
20.6%
Poor
|
26% 35.2 MB/s
|
64% 0.66 MB/s
| |
|
Samsung HN-M101MBB 1TB-$45
127GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2AR10001 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
|
28.2%
Poor
|
34% 45.8 MB/s
|
24% 0.22 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 16GB
null MHz
4096, 2048, 2048, 2048, 4096, 2048 MB
|
41.6%
Average
|
41% 14.3 GB/s
|
29% 10.2 GB/s
|
60% 66.7 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical P6X58D-E Builds (Compare 1,350 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus P6X58D-E
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-950Intel $100Bench 66%, 36,389 samples | 496x |
| Core i7 930Intel $199Bench 64%, 19,497 samples | 198x |
| Core i7 960Intel $220Bench 68%, 16,233 samples | 145x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 74x |
| GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 74x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 67x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 70% - Good | Total price: $288 |